Forum Replies Created

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Deluxe Big Muff transformer #119901
    TheGroke
    Member

    Just reporting back that the transformer mentioned above physically fits the chassis and appears to power the circuit OK. I did notice one weird thing: When I lift the output side of the 5554N IC and connect the control pin and -Vout (pins 11 and 12), I do get the correct +/-5.0V on on the output pins 14 and 11. However, these outputs drop to +/- 3.5V when the IC is fully in circuit. Also, it takes a moment for the compression and/or fuzz effects to kick in when I switch it on. I don’t know if this is my switch or a sign that I am pulling too much current for this transformer. I need to try another switch…

    in reply to: Bad Stone Mummy Version 1 oddity? #119788
    TheGroke
    Member

    Hi. Here is a pic of the rate knob connection. Two legs are strapped together, as you stated. The value is 1M, as on the schematic. Mine measures a span of ~180 to .9 M when in circuit.

    Let me know if you need anything else!

    Good luck,

    D

    in reply to: Deluxe Big Muff transformer #119768
    TheGroke
    Member

    Hi Ron,

    Thanks so much for the info. I’ll order one and try it out.

    best,

    DT

    in reply to: Bad Stone Mummy Version 1 oddity? #119648
    TheGroke
    Member

    cool… but awful if not looking for cool :)

    On mine, on the slow settings, the noise is still present as a light click. But as the rate increases, this click becomes more like a hum.

    in reply to: Bad Stone Mummy Version 1 oddity? #119646
    TheGroke
    Member

    Hey DW,

    Thanks for posting your info. Do you get clock noise at the high speeds when there is no signal being input (like on mine)? I never did figure out how to fix that (if it is even a fault – maybe you are saying it is intentional?) l

    Let me know if you need any readings off of mine.

    best – DT

    in reply to: Bad Stone Mummy Version 1 oddity? #119559
    TheGroke
    Member

    I took some more pictures. A lot of them are sort of bad – I was trying to get shots that covered components nested under components, etc. Didn’t work so well. I think the X-rays and the original set should be useful though. The others might come in handy when looking at individual component values.

    The ground wire for one of the batteries broke off in the second set (“after cleaning”), but it is quite easy to see where it should go in the first set (“before cleaning”) or on the original pictures that I posted.

    Here is a link to a zip of the pics:

    umich.edu/~damont/BadStoneVersion1.5.zip

    best – D

    in reply to: Bad Stone Mummy Version 1 oddity? #119554
    TheGroke
    Member

    Hey Scruffle,

    Thanks for your input. It seems plausible that this is something between the standard mummy face and the mummy face enclosure with 4049. I will dismantle it again and try to get some better shots for both sides, especially near that extra circuit.

    Any thoughts on the noise I’m getting at fast rates? There is one trim pot, and I can change the frequency of the noise by adjusting it (the buzz has more low frequencies in it than I previously indicated – so perhaps it is a hum and buzz), but doing so also cuts out a lot of the effect.

    best – D

    in reply to: Bad Stone Mummy Version 1 oddity? #119551
    TheGroke
    Member

    Lo and behold… this thing suddenly works. Cleaning up the boards, I found one loose capacitor. The ground connection was also a bit flakey.

    I have to say, the vibrato setting on this (via the color switch, oddly enough) yields a really pleasantly, messed up sound. I didn’t look at the wave, but it can’t just be a sine – seems much more complex – almost random. Gives everything you play has a real sea sick quality. Nothing like any other vibrato I have heard.

    The only issue is that I am getting some clock noise bleed. On the slow settings, it’s just a quiet occasional tick in the background, but when I put it on the fast settings, the clicks are close together and create a constant buzz when I am not playing.

    Assuming that the original V1 schematic is at least partially relevant – can anyone suggest which components might have gone south?

    Thanks – D

    in reply to: Bad Stone Mummy Version 1 oddity? #119543
    TheGroke
    Member

    Hm… the plot thickens. Well, thanks so much for checking yours – much appreciated. Some more info, if anyone is curious:

    The circuitry around what I am assuming is a scratched off LM324s certainly seems similar to Version 1. The four surrounding transistors (maybe 2N4302s, but marked with only “SCOTT” on mine) also make sense with this part of the schematic.

    The two similar looking transistors in the middle are also marked with only “SCOTT”. Those might be Q1-6, the 2N4302s from Version 1.

    There are also two more transistors on the component side marked FS37000 327. Not sure what those are. I found some posts on this forum claiming that they are PNPs. Could those be functional equivalents to Q8, the 2N5087?

    The transistor on the trace side is marked 2N5363. I guess that is Q7.

    I suppose I’ll need to attempt to draw something up for this if I am ever going to get it to work. Kind of cool to have this weird anomaly though :)

    Does anyone else out there have one that looks like this?

    Thanks again – D

    in reply to: Bad Stone Mummy Version 1 oddity? #119527
    TheGroke
    Member

    Thanks Ron – that would be great! Let me know if you need a link to the forum with the cloned schematic for comparison. I’m not sure I can post that here.

    If you do open one and find that it is the same, could you please take a picture of the wiring. I’m not 100 percent sure that mine is correct, and it’s hard for me to figure out without a schematic.

    best – D

    in reply to: Bad Stone Mummy Version 1 oddity? #119525
    TheGroke
    Member

    Hi Ron.

    I am mostly curious about the 741s and the surrounding circuitry.

    I believe the other two big ICs are just LM324s, which I believe are the A and B ICs in the original circuit, as seen here:

    htp://www.freeinfosociety.com/electronics/schemview.php?id=380

    I’m guessing EH just scratched them off to protect their circuit from being copied?

    But there are no 741 op amps on the original, not from what I have seen from Googling at least.

    Some members of one of the popular online stompbox forums made a clone of the mummy board. It looked similar to mine, but omitted the section with the 741s.

    Mine also has a different configuration of trim pots (I have one – others seem to have three or so).

    best – D

    in reply to: Bad Stone Mummy Version 1 oddity? #119522
    TheGroke
    Member

    Hi. I fixed the pics. They might looked cropped off, but if you right click and open them in a new tab (or just download them to your computer) then you will see the full view.

    best – D

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)