Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 169 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: new here: smmh #107799
    Quote:
    Quote:
    Hey, welcome to the board. Its nice to get a perspective from someone who didn’t know at all what to expect. I love the SMMH too, and for now my RC20xl is off my guitar board, although I’ll be keeping it in the fx loop of my mixer for various instruments. The SMMH has its limitations when you think you know what you’re looking for in a looper, but I like that it forced me to work differently. The way you describe erasing the loop is the way to do it, I think its kind of a pain in the ass as I have often erased a loop and then forgotten to turn the pedal back on before trying to loop again. But it is how it is, and I happily accept.

    Thaks for the response Ghost of Sim Tut. My goal right now is to work around the loop erasing thing so I get comfortable with it so that I can keep a musical flow going. Other than that, I just play with this pedal and am getting good results quickly.

    Tony

    I should point out, in case you’re not aware, that in loop mode the ‘repeats’ knob attenuates the loop, therefore you can play a part over an existing loop and fade the loop out slowly, or completely in one pass by setting repeats close to minimum. If you have good natural rhythm (and you should), you can play a new riff with a similar feel to the first riff and basically replace the initial loop with a brand new one that fits in the allotted loop length.

    in reply to: Danelectro Pedals #108499

    I love my Tuna Melt and the Fab Tone distortion. There’s a Mogwai video floating around youtube where he says that the fab tone is his favorite distortion, and they have a Big Muff named after them. He also says they break easily so he just buys a new one whenever he sees one.

    in reply to: SMMH Review! #109115

    I love tap tempo in loop mode for time stretching stuff. Its cool to set the hazarai knob preset to somewhere other than noon, for a different note. So you lay down a loop, then you can carefully press the haz knob with your foot (I play barefoot) to change pitch and then tap the tempo back in, which makes it revert to the original key. Great songcrafting thingy.

    in reply to: new here: smmh #109113

    Hey, welcome to the board. Its nice to get a perspective from someone who didn’t know at all what to expect. I love the SMMH too, and for now my RC20xl is off my guitar board, although I’ll be keeping it in the fx loop of my mixer for various instruments. The SMMH has its limitations when you think you know what you’re looking for in a looper, but I like that it forced me to work differently. The way you describe erasing the loop is the way to do it, I think its kind of a pain in the ass as I have often erased a loop and then forgotten to turn the pedal back on before trying to loop again. But it is how it is, and I happily accept.

    in reply to: the Poly/Mono WOG #102851

    The ring thing is indeed polyphonic, but we may be differing on the meaning of polyphonic. It does not do POG-like octaves in the sense that you can have a lower and upper at the same time, but to me polyphonic means that it handles full chords and pitch-bends the chords. And there’s no volume boost, but there is certainly a blend knob and a harmonizer, so for example I have it set to heel-down and there is no harmony, and as I move to tow-down I can blend the effect in, like a harmonizing 3rd or 5th or whatever I set it to.

    in reply to: THE GUITARS I BUILT…PLEASE LOOK….NEED FEEDBACK. #104438

    Great stuff, Grim. And I like the toastybuckers. Good luck to you with making some money with this. Big ups!

    Lots of variables here. What is the other distortion pedal that you want to drive it with? Dirt pedals are all so particular to me. Its hard to say what it will sound like. But as an example, I used to run a Big Muff in front of a Graphic Fuzz (distortion plus EQ) and it sounded amazing. However I think that was more due to the EQ part after the Muff than the two distortions. Other people run an overdrive-ish pedal like a tube screamer and a Big Muff at the same time with good results.

    in reply to: Which expression pedal for Ring Thing? #104902
    Quote:
    if I had to wager a guess, it’d be that the boss/m-audio ones are suited to +/- 5v whereas the aha-types are suited to 0-5v. but based on what my multimeter’s observed that’s made no sense to me.

    also i’m posting intoxicated, hopefully this all makes sense.

    Tsk tsk. Drinking and forum posting can only lead you down a wrong path. I can see you in Al Anon now: “My name is Cryabetes, and I am a drunk forum poster. I would just drink and..and…talk about voltage and knob twiddling…with strangers…in the comfort of my own home. So ashamed.”

    Admitting you have a problem is the first step. ;)

    in reply to: Micro POG for Bass ? #104904
    Quote:
    In relation to the tracking, I found the Micro POG it’s totally impressive…but I think the Octave Multiplexer must more faster than the Micro POG, for the reason of being analog pedal (I think the analogs pedal are fastest. I’m mistaken? Thanks for your wisdom!!!!)

    One more time, excuse my poor english…

    I think digital pedals usually track better. I haven’t played with the Multiplexer but my impression is that it is a one note at a time thing, while the Micropog can do full chords.

    OneSpot. Wait is the riddle 9V? Then, OneSpot.

    in reply to: RING THING REVIEW #104973
    Quote:
    thanks a lot for your review,I love the Frequency Analyzer,are you sure that the Ring Thing replace it?In your opinion,is the Ring Thing the evolution of the Frequency Analyzer pedal?

    For me, yes I like the RT better. I can get all the sounds out of the RT that I got out of the FA but the new one is more versatile. Be aware, the FA has a greally great sound, I mean really great. I think it has something to do with the analog design but I think it may have more to do with it being a higher voltage pedal. Like, it just has massive headroom. But it was limited in terms of control, and I’m on a big expression pedal kick, while also trying to limit my overall number of pedals. So for convenience I replaced 3 pedals with this one, and the ring modulator is really close in overall “claaang” to the FA with 10x more control.

    in reply to: Which expression pedal for Ring Thing? #105514
    Quote:
    Nope. no ring things here. slightly too poor/into delays for intense filters and modulation. But I made an assumption because 1- I have two yamaha fc-7s who both work terrifically
    2- a boss ev-5 works with the ring thing
    2a- a boss ev-5 is a 10K pot in a specialised enclosure
    2b- the fc-7 is a 50K pot ” ” ” ” thus resulting in better range

    I hadn’t read your review when I posted but it sounded like he was using mono plug expression pedals.

    actually when you used the FC-7 for your ring thing, was all the motion recognised in the first couple degrees from the heel-down/toe-up position?

    using them with my boss ps-3 does that too (with the boss re-20 works fine though…)

    When I plugged in the FC7 it made the slightest burp when I moved it from heel to toe, kinda like if you had an analog delay and just twisted the time knob real quick. Yeah I don’t know, for some reason pedals that should work as an exp pedal with EHX stuff just doesn’t necessarily do so. Maybe the range is too big with a 50K pot. The manual suggests the Boss or the M-Audio. Whatever, I’m happy now.

    in reply to: Micro POG for Bass ? #105612
    Quote:
    Quote:
    which pedal is better for a dubby synth octave tone the pog or the multiplexer for bass

    The pog, being digital, tracks better and I think it’s polyphonic, so it can handle more than 1 note at the time. The OM is analog, so it can sound muddyer and more synth-like.

    colaborando un poco…

    Everything SanquiFlerb said is correct but I’d like to add the Ring Thing into the mix. I’m talking about that thing all over this site recently but as I play it more it keeps getting sexier. I just sold a Micropog to get one. The MP is great but I really wanted the RT. Why I think the Ring Thing is better for Dub is because 1) it can do two octaves down and 2) it has a filter. You can get like sub-basement bass sounds and roll the highs off, and of course octave up as well for whammy stuff and mixing board trickery. I love dub. The only thing the MP has over the RT is that you can have all 3 octaves up and get the organ-ish sound. But for me, and for dub, the Ring Thing.

    in reply to: Which expression pedal for Ring Thing? #105705
    Quote:
    yamaha fc-7s work well too.

    It does? I just bought an FC 7 specifically for this application (see my review) and it totally did not work. I could tell that it recognized the signal (slight movement), but it didn’t have the range to actually do anything useful like a full octave dive. You’re using an FC7 with your Ring Thing?

    in reply to: PRE AMP RULE #106032

    Well again I don’t have the FH, but the picture shows a direct out, effect out, and blended out. If you are in mono you are probably using the blended out. However, with the Cathedral being stereo in, stereo out, you could use the Hoax’s direct out and effect out instead, to both sides of the Cathedral, then the Hazarai, then the amps. Then you would have more control over your sound and the stereo separation you’re looking for. :)

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 169 total)