Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 222 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: v6 BIG MUFF? any followers of this version? #104939
    Kitrae
    Member

    Billy’s Muff did not have the tone bypass, and you don’t get his sound with the tone circuit bypassed. He had his tone set around 1:00 on the V4, though it sounds more like 11:00 on a typical V3 or V6. I don’t get much use out of the bypass, but it does make a huge sound when you use it!

    in reply to: v6 BIG MUFF? any followers of this version? #104936
    Kitrae
    Member

    I have been jamming on some Pumpkins stuff through my V3 and V4 Muffs recently. The V4 really nails the Siamese Dream sound better in my opinion, but the V3 or V6 Muffs just seem to cut through a mix better if you are playing with a band. Most people would not notice a huge difference if I played some SD stuff with those Muffs side by side though. They all three version sound really good for that tone.

    in reply to: v6 BIG MUFF? any followers of this version? #104934
    Kitrae
    Member
    Quote:
    that is the biggest piece of crap ever!!! Its vintage bullsh*t, your life will be destroyed by the landskeeper if you buy this!!!!

    Perhaps you owned a bad one? They really don’t sound “that” different from the V3 Muffs.

    in reply to: v6 BIG MUFF? any followers of this version? #104933
    Kitrae
    Member
    Quote:
    im new to the muff. i was seriously thinking of buying one soon. id really love to find a v4 or v5 opamp version but i was lucky enough to come accross a really nice v6 big muff 3034 the other day for a decent price and it sounded really lovely for chords. i was wondering if any of you muff guys knew if there was any bad mojo behind the v6 models or any opinions??

    The two I have sound OK. Not as nice sounding as any of the three V3 Muffs I have, but the sound will vary from unit to unit. One V6 may sound better than another. I have some info on V6 Muffs here. The op-amp V4/V5 sound similar for chords, but not quite the same as the transistor versions. Whether you would like the V4/V5 better really depends on what kind of music you like to play with it.
    http://www.kitrae.net/music/big_muff_history.html#Version6

    in reply to: Whos your favorite all time guitar player???? #104757
    Kitrae
    Member

    Too many, but if I had to pick one I always enjoy listening to it would be Sir David Gilmour.

    in reply to: XO enclosures vs. Vintage enclosures — cast your vote. #104756
    Kitrae
    Member

    I prefer the vintage style big boxes, but if I were playing in a band and gigging every night I would want the smaller enclosures simply for space. I think you need both, though I don’t think the nano boxes look as cool as the older stuff, but I’m old :)

    in reply to: How To? #104755
    Kitrae
    Member

    It’s called sound-on-sound, and you need a delay with a separate 100% wet output jack and a volume pedal.

    Gilmour had a 1500ms delay with repeats set for about 20 seconds on his Roland SDE 3000, going into a volume pedal. The repeats from the delay (100% wet, nothing but the delayed signal) went to a separate Fender amp. The non delayed signal went to another amp so David could play the melody stuff over the sustained chords in the delay loop.

    Gilmour plays a chord, swells the volume pedal up for a second or two to get the repeats going, then back to zero to play the solo stuff over that looped chord.

    There are a lot of delays that do 100% wet. I think the Deluxe Memory Man does it, and most boss delays do it. By 100% wet, I mean there is a separate output for just the delayed signal with no dry signal at all, so all you hear is the echo through that jack.

    You could send both both the dry signal and the wet back to the same amp if you had one with two inputs, or you could send the wet signal out in a loop, then then mix both the dry and the wet signals back together with a mix pedal just before they hit the amp.

    in reply to: “Tone Bypass” V3 Big Muff? #104695
    Kitrae
    Member

    The V6 Muff with standard colors, V5s, and the tone bypass V3s all look identical from the outside. No way to tell what it is without seeing the inside

    in reply to: “Tone Bypass” V3 Big Muff? #104616
    Kitrae
    Member

    I have not decided yet, but as of today, I have seen four of these tone bypass V3 Muffs. I’m guessing only a few hundred were made from the time period they would have fallen in, though if Howard is right and the transistor version never actually went out of production in 1978-79 when the op-amps were made, the tone bypass V3 was likely made around the same time as the tone bypass op-amp.

    The way I have assigned Muff version numbers is based on this – A true version change must involve a major change to the box shape, a change to the control layout, and/or a major change to the circuit. This fits two of those criteria, and it may turn out that the tone bypass op-amp was the first version, not the second. Some re-sequencing may be needed simply for that reason, but I have not decided yet. I’m still digging and hoping some others will chime in with additional info.

    I may just cheat and call it another V3 “edition”. There are two V3 editions already, one with no “AC” graphic and one with.

    in reply to: “Tone Bypass” V3 Big Muff? #104586
    Kitrae
    Member

    Back to the topic of useless Muff history :)

    Howard shed some more light on this. He thinks the transistor Muff never actually went out of production in the short time his op-amp version was made in 1978. If the transistor version continued, and it had a tone bypass switch added shortly before the op-amp version was made, that may explain these odd V3s. These may be the rarest versions of the original USA Muffs. It also means the version numbers have to be resequenced!

    Howard said his op-amp schematic from 1978 already had the tone bypass switch. He does not think he made a schematic for a non tone bypass op-amp Muff, so that version may have actually come after, not before the bypass version. That seems a very odd thing to do though, considering all other transistor Muffs made from 1978 or so, until the factory closed in 1984, had the tone bypass.

    in reply to: New page at The EH Man’s Electro-Harmonix Extravaganza #104493
    Kitrae
    Member

    As always, very interesting read Ron. Thanks.

    in reply to: Russian Pedals? #104453
    Kitrae
    Member

    I believe the Mike Matthews Soul Kiss and Mike Matthews Red Army Overdrive were the first two Russian pedals made there.

    in reply to: The Jimi Hendrix Big Muff #104281
    Kitrae
    Member

    No doubt he had an LPB-1 since that was the first overdrive pedal of its type, but that was 1968, and I doubt Mike would confuse that little box, his first E-H product, with a Big Muff. I think all of the websites and various authors saying they think Mike is wrong about it being a Big Muff, or that Mike made it up, were simply saying that because they thought the Muff was not available until 1971. But they were wrong about that as well.
    http://www.kitrae.net/music/Mannys Bill of Sale.jpg
    I had always thought it was 1970, and enough people have verified that with me that I have no doubt it is correct now. I just don’t know the exact month.

    in reply to: Big Muff Reissues #104249
    Kitrae
    Member

    The second edition Red Army/Civil War is my favorite Sovtek, but my all time favorite is the V2 Ram’s Head/V3 tone. Nothing quite like that when cranked through a clean Fender Twin :)

    in reply to: Big Muff Reissues #104240
    Kitrae
    Member
    Quote:
    Quote:
    Quote:
    I am glad someone agrees with me! The new Big Muffs just do not compete with the older ones!

    based on what? 😆

    ……..all this misty eyed nostalgia it all well and good, but lets face it the reason those old muff’s fetch what they do has nothing to do with how they sound. Do you really think EHX have forgotten how to make a big muff?

    Exactly. Very apt my friend. Very apt indeed.

    I don’t agree that modern Muffs sound like crap compared to vintage ones. I like them all, but they ARE different guys. All Big Muffs have that distinct diode clipped sound to them, but there were MANY intentional component value changes to the Muff circuit by EH for the various versions that altered the sound. Just look at the schematics if you don’t have access to the different versions to hear it. Some were subtle changes, some were not, but they were intentional. I assume EHX thought they were improvements, or just mods to keep up with current trends in sound perhaps.

    Several value changes were made to the Sovteks also, and the same is happening with the current USA Muffs. Fran Blanche was the person responsible for the 2000 reissue Big Muff, the V9. She was directed by Mike Matthews to revamp the circuit. They had no intention of copying exactly any previous circuit. There have been a few changes to the V9 circuit since then, and then another circuit version was made for the Little Big Muff. Now we have the Tone Wicker version. Hopefully we will continue to see other changes in the future. It keeps Big Muffs interesting.

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 222 total)