if it were indeed a digital, POG combined with a fuzz it would end up expensive – it would have to cost more than the Micro POG so it wouldn’t take sales away from that… which would probably price it out of the reach of most potential customers…
unless EHX were to discontinue the Micro POG (which would no doubt upset quite a lot of people).
if it were a fuzz with an analogue, monophonic octaver that would be more viable… something along the lines of the Foxrox Octron but combined with a Muff fuzz/overdrive would be pretty cool.
Does anyone think it’s possible to fit a TC Polytune (or maybe a Korg Pitchblack) into an actual nano enclosure? To make my own ”’EHX”’ tuner!
it IS possible (Korg Pitchblack definitely, not so sure about the Polytune as it looks a little bigger) but it wouldn’t be easy and i don’t really see the point.
AMP – Pog2 – Germanium OD – Little Big Muff – Tuner – GUITAR
Little bit off topic, but how do you like the Germanium OD??
The Germanium OD is really great.
I use it more than my Fuzz pedals
I find myself constantly tweaking settings and finding interesting calibrations.
It is a well crafted design with the gain, bias, & volts set up.
i think the Germanium OD is a great pedal; most people are most aware of it for the nasty, garagey tones, but even subtle settings add a new element to your sound.
i often used mine at round about unity gain on a clean setting for the slight compression it has, and also because it imparts a nice ‘vintage’ quality to your tone.
now that were all ready talking about the Full Double Tracking Pedal, i all ways wanted to know how different it was from the Slap Back Echo pedal pictured below?
just guessing but probably not a lot.
that’s what i was thinking…
obviously the main difference is that where the Full Double Tracking pedal has switchable delay times, the Slap Back Echo doesn’t; but has a (low-pass?) filter switch instead.
maybe the preset delay time is different too. maybe.
oh, ok, i was just wondering because when people try to recreate doubling effect live by micing amps in a certain distance from each other, they usually use really shorter tims… whatever i believe you
Quote:
Well The Edge does it, doesn’t he? also John Petrucci was talking about it… whatever, just saying what i heard i must say – i don’t have any experience with other than real double tracking
from what i understand, the use of multiple microphones to capture a sound source (maybe with very short delays applied to reduce/remove phase issues) is NOT the same as automatic double tracking.
By the way, anyone know if there is a spot on these forums to actually talk swap/sales for EHX pedals? I don’t have a problem just reposting the pedal on Craigslist from time to time, but since the FDT pedal seems like more of a niche/collector type pedal that this would be the best place to trade or sell it. I certainly don’t want to abuse these forums if there’s not a spot on ’em designed for that so either way if someone could let me know it would be much appreciated.
no, when the forum began, it was decided this forum wouldn’t be a place for trades/sales between forum members.
there were a few reasons behind this decision but i can’t remember all of them…
i think one was something to do with not wanting people signing up to the forum JUST to sell their stuff – they want people here for the ‘right’ reasons.
for example, i have an old Digitech PDS-2715 dual pedal with distortion and chorus.
the chorus part of it is one of the best chorus sounds i’ve ever heard… yet it is a digital effect. i would not even have known it was digital if i hadn’t read the manual.
i’ve used some terrible sounding analogue delays and some great sounding digital ones.
i’m never concerned whether a pedal/effect is digital or analogue; i’ll try it and THEN make up my mind.
i’m not even adverse to using distortion/fuzz – i’ll give it a go; i’m not going to rule things out on (misguided) principal.
oh, ok, i was just wondering because when people try to recreate doubling effect live by micing amps in a certain distance from each other, they usually use really shorter tims… whatever i believe you
i’m not sure what you’re thinking of is a ‘doubling’ effect…
“The first, and most obvious, process was ADT, or automatic double-tracking, which was usually accomplished by using the playback-head monitor facility of a tape recorder to produce a short ‘slap-back’ delay. It’s this technique that creates the familiar effect that was used on countless early rock & roll records, and was famously exploited by artists such as John Lennon.
You can create the ADT effect easily using modern technology. Simply add a digital delay to the vocal at around the same level as the original part, with a delay time of 80-120ms, and then turn the feedback control to minimum so that you get only one repeat.”
Kevin Demuth – isn’t 50ms a little too much for double tracking effect?
tell that to Electro-Harmonix!
in all honesty, knowing EHX delay pedals the stated delay time may not be EXACT, but 40-50ms seems about right to me; less than that and it may sound more (comb-)filtered than doubled.
fwiw, i’ve got a rack delay unit where the ‘Doubling’ mode goes up to 225ms… and a chorus pedal with 56ms of pre-delay (which is great as a doubling effect).
wow, that question grew quick. ive never really had the money to experiment around with strings, but my choice/main and only knowlageable choice has been earnie ball slinky and when somebody says that ehx are way better, i cant wait to try em. also, i was thinking, for a longer sustain, would you want 9’s or 11’s?
heavier strings have more sustain and sound ‘better’.
if you’re currently using 9s, then i’d go to 10s on your next string change, then 11s after that – the jump from 9s straight to 11s is probably a bit too much of a change in one go.