Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 229 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: New Pick Ups #97579
    John J
    Member

    I’m not too sure what Brad Paisley uses but I would bet Fender offers something along those lines; I would look into the Fender Custom Shop myself although if you’re looking to spend a little bit… single coils don’t come much finer than Lindy Fralins.

    John J
    Member

    RE: Costch’s earlier statement.

    not alot of people have ambitions beyond emulation, unfortunately. it’s all a matter of misguided dreams; for some reason people think that being the next rolling stones involves sounding exactly like the rolling stones. they fail to realize that those records have already been made, and even though it’s still easy to appreciate and enjoy them, they are – in this day and age – devoid of any real artistic merit.

    for the same reason that someone who gets into metal invariably grows a horrible beard and stops playing or listening to any other kind of music, someone who gets into the beatles tries to write the proper followup to Abbey Road. hence my official formation of “The Society to Let Music Die” aka “The Committee to Keep the Past in the Past.” Now accepting members.

    on a similar note, i like the big boxes but ehx has already made those pedals. it’s time to move forward.

    in reply to: Polychorus vs DEM & Small Clone #97243
    John J
    Member

    if you don’t mind working for your sounds, the polychorus is about as good as it gets. you can come within inches of both the small clone and the DEM while nailing everything inbetween, plus it can self oscillate. i would argue that it has a far broader range of sounds than the dedicated units, although it is not nearly as easy to deal with. matter of fact, ive had mine two years now and i still can’t tell what sound im going to get just by looking at the knobs. the rate knob affects the effect’s depth just as much as the width knob, and proper settings on the feedback and tune knobs are absolutely crucial in attaining a decent sound.

    that having been said, i don’t think my small clone has left it’s box since i got this thing and the only other flanger ive bothered with is the flanger hoax. the polychorus covers everything.

    in reply to: Octave Fuzz? #97206
    John J
    Member
    Quote:
    I wonder what a frequency analyzer in a muff circuit would sound like…?

    It doesn’t matter if you run the Muff into the FA or the FA into the Muff, it sounds crazy mean.

    in reply to: EHX tuner pedal? #96778
    John J
    Member

    I’d buy it in one second.

    EDIT: Maybe not that fast, but I would eventually get one.

    in reply to: Q-tron versions? #96777
    John J
    Member

    http://www.talkbass.com/forum/showpost.php?s=75fc2ef9fac4cca42e7838f4d31cf25a&p=5112451&postcount=12

    That’s for a Bass Microsynth, but the poster talks about how he used the same method for doing his Q-Tron at the end of the post. I used this thread to mod my Micro Synth for LED status, it works nicely and it took my soldering iron longer to heat up than it did for me to do the actual work.

    Whole thread here: http://www.talkbass.com/forum/showthread.php?t=315187

    in reply to: EHX tuner pedal? #96746
    John J
    Member

    I would love to see an EHX tuner and you’re definitely not the first to ask, but I think the reason EHX has held off so far is that there is only so much innovation available when it comes to tuning. The Boss TU-2 is legendary for its reliability and the Korg Pitchblack is a bit smaller and has true bypass, I think Guyatone makes a bite-sized tuner that’s not much bigger than a 9v battery. Then you get into the crazy cheap (Behringer) or crazy expensive (Peterson Strobe) tuners, but despite all that diversity there’s not much room for EHX. Thusfar they have made their reputation on either making pedals weirder than everybody else or better than everybody else, usually both, and it’s hard to expand on such a simple concept without getting silly.

    HOWEVER, there is another thread around here asking for a simple polyphonic pitch shifter for droptuning. I’d bet dollars to dangers that it would make a mighty fine pairing with a simple tuner…

    in reply to: Tube Reverb and Tape Echo… #96745
    John J
    Member

    Cool, thanks! I found an old Akai GX-630D in town here for just under $70 CDN, as far as I can tell it’s in perfect working order and it looks functionally identical to the GX-215D. Now it’s just a matter of finding enough time to get this happening!

    PS that TEAC looks incredible… just plain incredible.

    in reply to: Q-tron versions? #96744
    John J
    Member

    The screw is nothing to worry about, it was just an old method for grounding. I’ve had some pedals that ran a wire to the backplate but most of them ground underneath the circuit board now (if I’m not mistaken).

    EHX started making their pedals true bypass a little while ago, and shortly before that they started shipping all of their pedals with 3PDT switches so that we could TB mod them ourselves – should we so desire, of course.

    All that aside, what do you think of it? It’s a fun little (big) box, hey?

    in reply to: Octave Multiplexer #96640
    John J
    Member

    I’ve always been curious about this, but sadly monophonic octavers just don’t really fit into my guitar pedalboard…

    Any chance you’ve tried it on a bass?

    in reply to: Double Muff? #96639
    John J
    Member
    Quote:
    Quote:
    Quote:
    I wish the double muff had tone controls. if it did, then i’d seriously consider buying it.

    Yeah it tends to be quite trebley and harsh sometimes, a tone control could really help.

    That’s just the nature of the effect. It’s not supposed to have a wide tonal range. If you want to mellow that treble out, just use the tone knob on your guitar. I know most people aren’t crazy about the tone knob, but it can be useful in making low fi, dull attack sounds.

    agreed, the Double Muff is wonderfully responsive to whatever’s going on with your guitar. Although I have to say that short of full gain, I have never used the word ‘harsh’ to describe the Double Muff… Are you running it first in line?

    in reply to: XO Pog or a even new version? #96495
    John J
    Member

    Given the addition of the expression control on the XO Worm, I was a touch disappointed by the lack of a CV in on the XO Frequency Analyzer and the lack of a footswitchable Fuzz On/Off on the new Graphic Fuzz… Still, an updated POG would be cool – expression control over the sliders themselves would be great, where the slider’s position is the maximum setting and the expression fades the voices in ala the volume mode on the HOG.

    OR: Have a single preset button, and then have the expression pedal fade between the current settings and the preset – allowing you to go from bass to organ with either a single click or a simple rock of the heel. This would totally jive in the larger XO boxes, like a new Micro Synth but with two stompswitches.

    in reply to: What kind of music do you play? #96344
    John J
    Member

    Well, I have been recording lonesome for close to five years now. It’s called Lo-Fi, I suppose, even though I try my best for a hi-fi sound: http://www.myspace.com/wchurchkill

    I also play in a drone band, which I quite like, and an instrument-swapping, blues-heavy ‘drinking band.’ After it gets too late to play loud, each member is given seven minutes to write a song start to finish and perform it with an acoustic guitar. Seriously, everyone should do this – some of the best and worst songs we’ve ever written have come as a result of that process, and it gives you an immediate framework with which to expand upon should you so decide. “Spilled Milk” on the Churchkill page got its start there, plus a dozen others that I either haven’t totally figured out where to go with or just haven’t gotten around to recording.

    in reply to: Drop Tune Pedal Idea #96339
    John J
    Member

    I’ve tried:

    Boss DF-2, MXR Bass Blowtorch, Fulltone Full Drive II, Maxon OOD-9, Zvex Box of Metal, Boss ODB-3, Way Huge Fat Sandwich, EHX Graphic Fuzz, MXR Blue Box, and both the NYC and the XO Little Big Muff (I don’t own all of those, though).

    When you run the dirt into the HOG, you wind up with a digitized sound that sounds absolutely great when you blend in the dry signal with a few intervals turned up. Using it to tune down gives you a really synthetic sound that isn’t intolerable, but certainly not a tone worth chasing. Proper use of the filter will allow you to get by, but the other guitarist in my band is a real tone snob and so this method just couldn’t fly.

    It’s difficult to describe the problem you get when you run the HOG into the distortion – it was the most pronounced on the Box of Metal (which I returned near immediately) and least noticeable on the Graphic Fuzz. I guess I would say that it introduces a subtle fizziness and gives you a highly synthetic sounding tone. The part that irked me is that the problem doesn’t arise on the +1 or -1 settings, and is much less noticeable even in the more ‘extreme’ slider shifts. It seems it’s only when you try to tune specific pitches with the expression pedal that you run into trouble because I’ve used HOG -> Big Muff for fuzzy basstones on more recordings than I’ve used an actual bass for, and in an experiment, I played a ‘guitar’ solo running a bass shifted up two octaves into the Graphic Fuzz just to see how it sounded. I was far from disappointed.

    I’m almost positive the problem has to do with the expression pedal because when you shift the original pitch up an octave or down an octave, it doesn’t sound the same as if you just use the +1 or -1 sliders…

    in reply to: Tube Reverb and Tape Echo… #96294
    John J
    Member
    Quote:
    And any reel-to-reel tape recorder can be looped so as to function as an echo machine. Cheap and great fun to experiment with.

    ANY reel to reel tape recorder? Do tell…

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 229 total)