Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 229 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: MIcrosynth and XO version is there a difference? #94912
    John J
    Member

    Bent steel is 24v I believe, but that hardly matters. I have heard that the XO is somehow ‘cleaner’ but buddy couldn’t explain what he meant so I didn’t take his comment too seriously. I heard from someone else that that XO’s trigger slider / envelope response is a little easier to control: the trigger slider is a little more consistent with which notes START the filter sweep and which ones play through the sweep. Once again, I’m a bit skeptical but you never know. I wouldn’t mind giving the two an A/B to settle this once and for all, but I’ve only seen one XO Microsynth in Calgary and it was a bass version.

    in reply to: Question about Flanger Hoax #94861
    John J
    Member

    I’m pretty sure the reason they suggest running it through the effects loop is because it sounds balls before distortion on most settings, and you basically lose the through zero capabilities. Run it after your distortion pedals and the Twin will love it.

    in reply to: double muff #94704
    John J
    Member

    Actually I have had the exact opposite experience… I find the quieter pickups to really shine with the Double Muff, that way you can play almost clean on the quieter notes but get a delicious fuzzy OD when you dig in a little bit. However, in regards to it being picky – make sure you are running it before any other effects (or at least before any with buffered bypass). It is really particular about this; if you run it after any buffers, you get a really harsh/trebley sound. I’m sure you’ve figured it out by now, but I figured it was worth mentioning – it took me a really long time to figure that out because I wasn’t entirely sure which of my effects were true bypass.

    in reply to: Check out my band’s first tracks, its EHX throughout! #94591
    John J
    Member

    Wow, I love it!

    in reply to: Pine Boxes? #94588
    John J
    Member

    The pine box was the deciding factor in my purchase of the Small Stone, and the reason I opted for the Q-tron rather than the Q-tron+. Although I wouldn’t know anything about what else you can keep in the boxes, I swear!

    in reply to: Coming Soon? #94524
    John J
    Member

    Bring them all! More envelope filters! More boosters! More delay! It is time!

    in reply to: Happy Pi Day (3/14) #94523
    John J
    Member

    Happy Pi Day!!!

    I will celebrate it today, because I say March 14th (which is numerically written as 3/14, not 14/3 which would be pronounced The Fourteenth Of March).

    in reply to: Compressor, Compressed: New diecast White Finger #94521
    John J
    Member

    Slick! I’m tempted…

    I have to say this. I have grappled with it for months now, but I am finally ready to commit to my opinion that XO>Big Box. I still like both, but I think if given the choice of the same pedal in one of the two boxes I would pick the XO. Gah, I can’t believe I finally admitted that!

    in reply to: Signal Pad, Anyone? #94520
    John J
    Member

    I don’t know how it breathes life into your pedals, but it seems like a great idea for running before distortions or after pedals which give you a weird volume boost like the Clone Theory. I guess it would make it SUPER easy to handle a Fuzz Face; with the flick of a switch you can go between OD and fuzz without having to try and find that sweet spot on the guitar’s volume knob every time. Same goes for dirty amps.

    I’ve yet to see one in store or catch a review online, but honestly it seems like something you either could or couldn’t use. There’s not alot of mystery to it, except for how it could breathe that life…

    John J
    Member

    Wrist watch might not be a bad idea, “Sorry I’m late for band practice” is one of my most-uttered phrases these days.

    The obvious downside being…

    in reply to: Anybody? #94420
    John J
    Member
    Quote:
    thats not so much a studio backdrop as it is a rug.

    Well I’ll be damned. You’re right! I’ve gotta say though, I hate it when sellers do this… try and get an exorbitant amount of money because — “You can’t Win if you don’t Play, right kiddo?”

    in reply to: Anybody? #94417
    John J
    Member

    Give these folks a break! The price is ridiculous, but buddy has bills to pay. For instance: one of the employees took those pedals to a professional studio to get their ebay picture taken. Well, either that or else they bought a studio backdrop to keep in their guitar shop. Either way, little stuff like that adds up pretty quickly.

    in reply to: Small Stone Update +++ #94392
    John J
    Member

    Post deleted, I assume?

    I would like to see the Bad Stone back as well, but as you may or may not already know, the Worm has a manual mode and the Polyphase has both a resonance control and an expression control that allows you to sweep the phase manually. The new XO version of The Worm is supposedly super quiet, and it has expression control as well. I hear that the Bad Stone has a super unique sound, though, and it would be nice to see that back on the EHX lineup someday. The Polyphase is super cool but I found that on the ‘typical’ settings (Phase 90 / Small Stone type swooshing), it kind of lacked personality. It didn’t sound bad by any stretch of the imagination, but IMO there was nothing to write home about until you cranked the resonance or hit the square wave settings.

    in reply to: Behringer Clones of EH Pedals #94391
    John J
    Member

    Ha. When the Behringer line first came out, I was stoked to see that they were ‘reissuing’ discontinued effects. Then I actually saw one of the pedals and was a little bummed out – better to buy one $10 hammer than two $6 hammers in a lifetime, right? Then they started selling copies of pedals currently in existence, and not just stuff like rehoused Tubescreamers or Big Muffs but cosmetic duplicates of the Deluxe Memory Man and I was just kind of… bummed out. The DMM is an expensive pedal and I don’t contest the idea of an affordable duplicate, don’t get me wrong! But at least make it LOOK a little different, at least make an EFFORT to create a pedal that can exist on its own reputation.

    FWIW, I saw a demo of the Time Machine and it sounded like I would expect a decent analog delay to sound. Honestly though, I’m just bored with analog delay lately – there’s too much exciting stuff going on in the digital world. Boss knows it, EHX knows it, soon guitarists everywhere will know it and hopefully one day even the hardest analog purists will admit that digital effects CAN sound pretty darn good.

    in reply to: True Bypass or Buffered bypass…. #94390
    John J
    Member

    Yeah, there’s no reason NOT to have them both on the same board. I just wouldn’t want to have to go from one to the other all the time, I prefer a board made of drastically different sounds that I can use together rather than having different flavors of the same sound that I can go between.

    Personal preference, I should have clarified that in the post.

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 229 total)