Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 159 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Problem with Canyon #124239
    gvelasco
    Member

    Make sure you’re using the correct power supply. The one that came with it is preferable, but if not, then one that supplies the correct amount of voltage and current.

    Supplied EHX9.6DC 200mA AC adapter. The CANYON requires 150mA at 9VDC with a center-negative plug.

    Then, do a factory reset following these instructions:

    To erase the secondary knob settings of every mode and reset the internal footswitch’s tap tempo to the factory default, first unplug the CANYON from power. Press and hold both the TAP/DIVIDE switch and the footswitch. Then, while holding both switches, plug power back in to the CANYON. The LED will cycle through red, orange and green to indicate that the CANYON has been restored to factory default secondary knob settings and tap tempo settings.

    Let us know if this helped.

    gvelasco
    Member
    Quote:
    Is it possible to sync Canyon to a DAW or to another hardware device by using an 8-Step Program running into the Tap Tempo jack?…Can it be done?

    In theory someone could create a device to do this, but no one has.

    What you’re supposed to plug in there is a dedicated external tap tempo switch. EHX doesn’t make one. (What’s up with that EHX?) Saturn Works makes a small, reliable, popular one. Many other companies, including some EHX competitors like MXR, etc, make one. These are very simple circuits that just “ground” the switch every time you tap it. There is no control voltage (CV), trigger signal, or Expression value.

    The 8-Step Program can generate control voltages (CV) from 0V to +5V and Expression Pedal (Exp) values which require a TRS (Stereo) 1/4″ cable and input jack. This is not what you need.

    The EHX Clockworks generates trigger pulses from 0V to +10V, again not what you need.

    Honestly, what’s wrong with just turning playing your song on the DAW and tapping the right tempo into the Canyon? You should be able to get very close.

    in reply to: EHX pedals in July #124223
    gvelasco
    Member
    Quote:
    Last month I bought an EHX Canyon delay pedal…

    I made several posts in the Tips and Tricks section on other ways you could use the Canyon delay, for example as a POG, a vibrato, or a reverb. It’s an extremely versatile pedal. Definitely one of their best ever.

    in reply to: A B switchblade box #124209
    gvelasco
    Member

    Yes. But, be careful. You want to use something like the Switchblade which only allows A/B (A or B), rather than the Switchblade Plus which also allows A+B. You do not want to have the speaker output from both amps going to the Y output at the same time. The plain old Switchblade will prevent this problem.

    in reply to: lester G placement #124203
    gvelasco
    Member
    Quote:
    The compressor in the Lester G is what the Platform pedal was designed from. Its wonderful.

    Wow. That’s good to know. The Platform is a great compressor.

    in reply to: lester G placement #124197
    gvelasco
    Member
    Quote:
    where should I locate my lester G in my singnal chain? thanks

    You can certainly put it anywhere in the chain that you like. You’re not going to break anything. After all a Leslie simulator is just a very fancy combination of

    Tube amp emulation to emulate the power amp of the Leslie.
    Synchronzied flanging and tremolo to emulate the spinning rotor.
    Filters to emulate the combination of woofer and horn.

    But, think about the sonic image you’re attempting to project and what the pedal is supposed to do. Imagine that you were using a real Leslie speaker/amp. Would that go at the beginning of your effects chain or at the end? At the end of course because everything would have to plug into it.

    What if you want to use the stereo output to actually make the sound physically swirl around the room. You can’t do that by putting it at the front of your effects chain unless every single effect after it is also stereo. If you want to do real stereo, you’re pretty much going to have to put it at the end of your effects chain, right before the board or your two amps.

    Speaking of going into a board, either a live mixer or a recording system, the Lester is an amp & cabinet simulator in the very best sense of the word. It’s a cabinet sim on steroids. Normally cabinet sims are the last thing in the chain right before the DI box, the DAW, whatever. They are intended to make the signal sound like you’re micing an amp and/or cabinet, rather than going directly into the mixer which sounds terrible. In general any amp/cabinet simulators would go at the end of a chain. Obviously things like Radial and “Two Notes” active DIs with amp/cab simulation HAVE to go at the end. Tech 21 and other SansAmp like DIs also have to go at the end of the chain. The EHX Battalion and Bass Metaphors are designed to go at the end of the signal chain. The EHX Tortion is designed to go at the end of the chain if you use it as a DI. All of these are amp/cab simulators. The Lester G is the most complex amp/cab simulator of them all.

    As far as the issue with having a compressor, there are some options. You could just not use it. In fact, lots of guitar players get the Lester K because they already have a compressor and they don’t need the one in the G. Or, you can play with it to get the compression level correct. A compressor, in contrast to a limiter, does TWO things. It both LIMITS the signal and BOOSTS the signal. It squashes sounds that are too loud and boosts sounds that are too soft. If you are producing much more volume than the amount of noise in the signal, then when you squash it down it will squash the noise even lower. A compressor used in the right way can actually reduce the noise in your signal. By using the right amount of sustain, attack, and “squish” setting, you should be able to dial in a reasonably quiet signal, certainly while you’re playing. The key is to avoid the temptation of using too much sustain.

    Of course, your mileage may vary. The only way to really figure out what works for you is to try it. Again, you won’t break anything.

    You are the music-maker,
    And you are the dreamer of dreams,
    Wandering by lone sea-breakers,
    And sitting by desolate streams…

    in reply to: lester G placement #124191
    gvelasco
    Member

    At the end…just like a real Leslie speaker.

    in reply to: New respect for EHX – PitchFork and Synth9 #124166
    gvelasco
    Member

    My experience has been that in every case where EHX is either reissuing one of their classic pedals, or they are “kloning” someone else’s classic pedal, they go beyond just cloning and actually make improvements to the original circuit while retaining the best qualities of the original circuit.

    First, with all of their reissues, they are putting them in the more durable and pedalboard friendly diecast enclosures. In many instances where the original issue didn’t have a 9V adapter port, the new one does. Where the old circuit was noisy, the new circuit is quiet. Where the old one might have had unity gain issues, the new one is corrected.

    With the Op-Amp Big Muff, it sounds like they kept the mojo of the original Op-Amp Big Muff, but they added the ability to bypass the tone circuit.

    With the Soul Food, which is a Klon Klone, they make the buffered bypass internally switchable. This is a great improvement over the original because many people don’t need an always on buffer in their modern pedalboard configurations.

    With the Glove OD, which is a Fulltone OCD clone, they make it 9V/18V internally switchable. The Fulltone switched to 18V when it’s plugged into an 18V adapter. With the EHX, you can run it at 18V internally on a 9V adapter. That’s much more convenient for most people that are using 9V 1SPOT daisy chain adapters.

    With the Satisfaction, which is a Gibson Tonebender clone, there are many improvements over the original design but they nail the tone.

    In every single case that I can think of EHX goes beyond just doing a reissue or a clone and thinks carefully about what they can add to the circuit to make it better…THEN they sell it for a GREAT price. I really feel like EHX pedals are the best VALUE in every category right now. They may not be the absolute best pedal in any of those categories, but they are always the best VALUE, and in many cases they ARE the best – even compared to very expensive boutique pedals. In some cases EHX has designed their own very unique signature sound pedals that no one else offers, and you don’t have to pay boutique pedal prices for them.

    in reply to: Silencer #124159
    gvelasco
    Member

    That’s basically the way noise gates work.

    Sources of noise: Very hot pickups, single coil pickups, bad grounding, bad shielding on the electronics, lots of gain, poorly shielded cables, fluorescent lights, electrical equipment, noisy effects.

    EHX makes a box, the Hum Debugger that is NOT a typical noise gate. Instead, it looks for a signature hum in your signal and “subtracts” it. The Hum Debugger doesn’t work based on a volume threshold to “open” the circuit, so you can have a much larger dynamic range without noise. You should look into it.

    in reply to: Introducing the Oceans 11 Reverb #124150
    gvelasco
    Member
    Quote:
    Is this pedal like the Canyon, in that if the Tails switch is OFF the pedal is true bypass? Thanks.

    The Oceans 11 is essentially a Canyon delay with delay algorithms swapped out for reverb algorithms. Neither one has what is normally referred to as “true bypass.” Both of them have what is usually referred to as “digital bypass.” The circuit stays engaged the entire time to sense the footswitch. Any pedal with a “soft” switch, which is a button really, as opposed to one that clicks, is almost always a digital bypass rather than a “true” bypass that just connects the input directly to the output.

    The internal Tails switch works the same way on both pedals. With tails on, the tails (echos, trails, tails) will continue and trail off naturally when you step on the switch to bypass the effect. Whith tails off, the tails (echos, trails) cut off immediately.

    gvelasco
    Member

    It sounds like something you might be able to fix with the trim pots in the MT. It has eight of them, and some of them are notoriously interactive and sensitive. I got this from another forum. If you just do a search on Memory Toy trim pots, you’ll find lots of info:

    Quote:
    I bought a Memory Toy on ebay and opened it for inspection and possible fine tuning (it did’nt oscilate as expected when one max the feedback knob).

    There’s not much information regarding this particular circuit, so I thought it could help someone if I’d spread some info. By what I saw on the Memory Man schematic, on BL3208 datasheets and making some measurement with my multimeter I’ve found out that for Revision D of the Memory Toy PCB we have:

    4 bias trimpots, one for each BBD chip, trimpots marked with numbers 1, 2, 3 and 5
    1 modulation depth control trimpot, marked “MOD DEPTH”
    1 Balance adjustment trimpot, marked with number 6, placed at the output of the last BBD
    1 feedback loop gain adjustment trim, marked with number 4
    1 unity gain adjustment trimpot (Trimpot #7), placed on the main board

    Yesterday I’ve played a little bit with the #4 and found out that finding a sweet spot wasn’t easy I’ve measured the bastard and found out that a slight turn made a huge change in the resistance value (0-20k). I’ll do some more experimentation tonight.

    in reply to: Electro-Harmonix Cock Fight Plus #124137
    gvelasco
    Member

    I can’t compare it to the Cock Fight other than Youtube vidz I’ve seen, but I’m very happy with the sound and feel of the Cock Fight Plus. It has replaced a vintage Thomas Organ Crybaby Stereo Fuzz Wah becayse the Crybaby was too heavy and I had to rig something to power it with a 9V adapter. The Cock Fight Plus is a great pedal.

    in reply to: should i get an XO worm? #124136
    gvelasco
    Member

    Actually, some of the other EHX Expression Pedal Wahs give you the option to have the expression pedal control the rate or the sweep, so this was a very reasonable assumption. I would be nice if you could choose with the Worm. Of course tap tempo would be nice with the Worm, but they don’t have that either. :-) Still I really like what it does to my sound, so it’s a keeper.

    in reply to: should i get an XO worm? #124132
    gvelasco
    Member
    Quote:
    I believe the expression pedal controls only rate rather than sweep.

    The expression pedal controls the sweep, not the rate. It is exactly like setting it to MANUAL/EXP and turning the RANGE knob with your hand.

    Without the expression pedal, the MANUAL/EXP gives you a cocked wah on the WAH setting, a notched filter on the PHASE setting, a “harmonic” filter on the TREM setting, and pretty much nothing on the VIBR setting because of the way the vibrato works.

    With the expression pedal, the MANUAL/EXP gives you a wah pedal on the WAH setting, a foot-controlled phase on the PHASE setting, a foot-controlled harmonic filter on the TREM setting, and a strange, extremely subtle detune on the VIBR setting.

    The wah on the worm has a very wide range and a fairly narrow Q to my ear.

    This means there are at least ten ways to get a wah with EHX pedals, and they’re almost all a bit different.

    1. Wailer Wah – Crying tone with rack.
    2. Crying Tone Wah – No moving parts.
    3. Crying Bass Wah – Crying Tone tuned for bass.
    4. Cock Fight Plus – Cock Fight built into a pedal.
    5. Cock Fight with Expression Pedal – Includes classic fuzz.
    6. Blurst with Expression Pedal
    7. Enigma with Expression Pedal – Riddle tuned for bass.
    8. Riddle with Expression Pedal
    9. Talking Machine with Expression Pedal – Wah and Bass Balls mode.
    10. Worm with Expression Pedal

    in reply to: Can I go headphones out through a Signal Pad #124114
    gvelasco
    Member
    Quote:
    …I’m wondering if I can keep the amp cranked and then run Amp Headphones Out > Signal Pad > Headphones to cut the volume which would otherwise blow out the speakers in my cans.

    Hm. That’s a bit tricky. At first blush I wouldn’t think that would work. The Signal Pad is designed to work with instrument level signals. The headphone out is actually a powered output, but the power is low (milliwatts) and designed to push higher impedance speakers – the headphones @ 50 – 100 ohms.

    Power soaks that take the speaker level powered output and drop it down to lower power levels or even line levels, have to incorporate heat sinks in addition to resistance to get rid of all that extra power which is converted into heat.

    With the headphone out of your amp, you’re dealing with so little power that the heat probably won’t be a problem, but I don’t know if the resistors would have the right values, and then if it would sound good.

    I think you might be better off using a headphone amp, like the EHX Headphone Amp.

    Headphone OUt -> EHX Headphone Amp -> Headphones

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 159 total)