Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 106 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 2 different Microsynths? #111066
    Folkstone57
    Member
    Quote:
    To add sustain to the MicroSynth add a compressor pedal like the Soul Preacher.
    It adds tons of sustain and evens out your picking to give it a more even keyboard attack.
    Almost all the Effectology videos featuring a MicroSynth use a compressor in front of it.

    I just want to add that it is almost an given that you have to use a COMP before the MicroSynth. This gadget is very dependednt on what it gets, very much like the HOG. The COMP gives both these pedals much more to work with. Also, since both have envelope & attack adjustments, it’s a requirement that you have a signal that can be modified, i.e. you can’t get a shorter/longer attack or decay than the source signal itself.

    in reply to: Voicebox and Compressor #110931
    Folkstone57
    Member

    Hello All,

    A COMP won’t do anything for pitch but it may help you hear more clearly if you are monitoring the FX while you sing. If you use it live this will help you keep the monitor level down so you can hear your own voice in the mix clearly & concentrate on finding your pitches. Same in the studio but of course you can listen to your recording, say something like “AAAAAARRRRGGGGGGHHHHH!” & then try it again………..

    in reply to: Pog 2: where to place on a pedalboard? #110930
    Folkstone57
    Member

    Hello All,

    I’d put the POG before Delay/Reverb, but it also depends on what sound you are trying to create. If you want a lot of sound shaping, use your distortion to create the raw tone for the POG. I have a HOG & I have found the sound to be very reliant on what the HOG gets first to filter & pitch shift. Time based stuff should go at the end IMHO because I find that with a lot of filtering/pitching the time based FX’s tend to get lost. Of course, if you can run some things in parrallel things get a LOT more interesting…………..

    in reply to: Loop Pedal Idea #110697
    Folkstone57
    Member
    Quote:
    i think it would be great if ehx could make a simpler looper, that is more practical to bring around to gigs. It may not have as much to offer as the 2880, but an ehx performance looper would be awesome! im thinking something like the looper on the line 6 dl4, but with more loop recording time. There would be a button for rec/overdub and a play/stop button and maybe a reverse and all that kind of unnecessary stuff

    Hello,
    I’m very much afraid that no matter what kind of looper EHX were to make there would be complaints. Either it’s too complicated with way too much record time or it doesn’t have the features a true looper-ist needs. I think the 2880 is great as it is & perhaps EHX personnel will take the hints from these forums & continue to shape & mold it until the entire looping loopy world is happy. Oh, that’ll be the day hell freezes over & I become the first Pope to marry Heather Graham. Yep, that will be a good day…….

    in reply to: EH Freeze #110340
    Folkstone57
    Member
    Quote:
    I just got this pedal and it’s truly inspiring. I also own the Stereo Memory Man with Hazarai and the Cathedral, but I have always been unhappy with the fact that you could not latch the overdub on the SMMwH

    What would a “latch” on the overdub acheive?

    My only complaint at this point is that you can’t overdub, but being able to grab any sound at the input and turn it into a drone opens up a world of possibilities, so I’ll try not to think of the Freeze as a looper.

    The Freeze is a looper as far as it takes whatever you put into it & loops it. Looping originally comes from tape loops which were just patched together to form a tape loop. Some could be overdubed but originally not. You just looped whatever had been recorded previously. So the Freeze is a one-shot looper.

    in reply to: EHX Micro Synth Mod!!! #110311
    Folkstone57
    Member
    Quote:
    Hey Shotgunn! It’s Jon Phipps, the guy who was probably your first Micro synth mod customer! How’s it going?

    The ‘guitar’ voice which on my pedal used to be clean and on your modified pedal is clean, but on my modified pedal the guitar voice sounds very distorted, much like the square-wave voice.

    Where do you suggest i start trouble-shooting for problems with the ‘guitar’ voice? The true-bypass works fine so i don’t know why the guitar voice is kicking in with distortion.

    Hello,

    I have the same problem with my pedal & it is the old box enclosure. However, mine is distorting no matter what setting or voice I use. The Square slider does still make a difference, but only in degree.

    Also, shotgun, how much is your MOD?

    in reply to: A question from an ex multi effects guy #110296
    Folkstone57
    Member

    Hello,
    Another thing to keep in mind is running parrallell FX. For instance, phase & chorus work rather nice this way, especially if you’re playing someplace that you can set up a front/rear P.A. as I did for one of my Pink Floyd shows some time ago. I sent the chorus to the raer P.A. with the
    mix on 0 & some predelay so that after my front sound got started the rear P.A. came in. It sounded great.

    in reply to: Behringer Clones of EH Pedals #110215
    Folkstone57
    Member

    Hello All,

    I own the Vintage Tube Overdrive by Behringer as well as the Spectrum Enhancer & one of the mixers & assorted other gadgets. I also own the EHX English Muffin mainly because i wanted to continue experimenting with tube pedals & I’ve owned EHX pedals for over 20 years. I love my EHX EM & it has far more variety than the Behringer VT999 pedal, but I’ll still keep it. I really don’t think Behringer should be the reviever of such criticism as in it’s all junk or cheap gear. There’s nothing wrong with inexpensive.

    in reply to: SMMH trails mod? #109728
    Folkstone57
    Member
    Quote:
    Hi,

    anyone tried to mod the Hazarai MM to have trails? Any info on the matter is appriciated, I don’t care about the stereo operation of the unit at all, if I could mod the SMMH to have trails in mono, it would be nice…

    Don’t care about the trails on/off either, I just need them all the time by default.

    How does the bypassing of SMMH works anyways? I see it’s a 3PDT, but I haven’t traced it to see what does it switch on/off

    Any infos?

    Cheers

    Hello,

    DO you mean trails so that when you hit the bypass switch? I know the Echolution from Pigtronix does that. You can of course use a mute switch before the SMMM which would achieve what you want without digging into the electronics.

    in reply to: Your HOG Favourite and Secret Settings #109726
    Folkstone57
    Member
    Quote:
    Hell all,

    Following the purchase of this amazing box, and the settings I’ve seen here made by Bill, I wanted to create a sticky, with a Hog template, in which you can post your favourite/secrete settings.

    Let’s share with everyone.

    Here is the template:

    EHX Hog

    Hello All,
    I just wanted to add a note to this idea which I think is a good one. Reminds me of the patch sheets that KEYBOARD magazine used to do. I got all my best CZ sounds that way. Anyway, my add to this is that I’ve found the HOG is EXTREMEMLY dependent on the sounds it gets. When I first got the thing, I couldn’t for the life of me get anything that sounded in any way usable. So, I used my standard well thought out SOP & simply gave up for the evening & went on to something else. The next day I was working on a completely different set-up for my guitar & just off the cuff decided to run it through the HOG to see what would happen. After a couple of minor tweeks I had almost the sound I was going for the previous evening. Ever since then I start with my guitar sound & then try the HOG to see the result. So, a helpful bit on the HOG patch sheet would be an additional area for pickup settings, FX before the HOG, etc. Because the HOG has several filters, I now think of it as a very versital “Colour/Tone” FX rather than a straight synth. The HOG is a much more dynamic gadget than I first realized when I saw some of the videos. It’s amazing & one of the best pieces of gear in my FX arsenal.

    in reply to: Holy Grail Reverb arrived yesterday #109672
    Folkstone57
    Member
    Quote:
    Quote:
    Hi Invader,
    Did you purchase the pedal specifically for the hall reverb setting? Kinda curious since you already have the spring unit on your Fender amp. Or maybe you need it for another reverbless (is that a word) amp??

    -Kirk

    No i bought the unit for use with my Marshall JCM 800 50 watt combo that lets say the reverb on it is less than desirable…But even so i like the hall reverb better than the spring reverb on my Fender ..But the spring reverb on my Fender is better than the spring reverb on the pedal..But the pedal is better overall..I got myself confused reading that so i hope you can follow what i’m trying to saying…

    Hello,

    I was OK until you said ” I got myself confused reading that so i hope you can follow what i’m trying to saying…”, THEN I realized I was completely lost……………..

    in reply to: RING THING REVIEW #109669
    Folkstone57
    Member
    Quote:
    Hey,

    “* Any one ever tried that (Black Box Pedal Board for non M-Audio Products ? * (I perhaps should have made a separate post about that topic and perhaps expression pedals in general as well rather then getting off topic of your great review (which has garnered my interest in the RT !)

    ambienttales

    Hello,

    I’ve used my BlackBox pedal for several others things with no problem. As far as I can tell, it works exactly the same as the pedal that comes with the HOG.
    :poke: :rawk: :D

    in reply to: Stereo Memory Man w/ Hazari has gap on loop #102311
    Folkstone57
    Member
    Quote:
    I do not have this gap problem with the SMMH.

    Sadly I find that EHX pedals do not behave the same from product to product. I do love this pedal though. Looping the delayed sounds is a big deal.

    I’m not sure what you mean here. Are both statements related or do you mean that you are the lucky person who has a SMM without the glitch/chopped off audio problem?

    in reply to: Stereo Memory Man w/ Hazari has gap on loop #103008
    Folkstone57
    Member
    Quote:
    Quote:
    Quote:
    Hi! I found that with mine also. At first I thought it may be a fault as I was used to doing loops on a 202 sampler(with a 202 you edit out the gap) I have found that with practice you can get it so it loops good and if your playing in a band situation it wouldnt be noticed ( as long as you got it in time haha!)

    Hello,
    I would think using it live would present it’s own problems since I’ve only recorded with mine & it usually takes a few tries to get the part I’m recording to not get chopped at the loop. I just bought a BOSS Slicer & although I recorded several loops with it I’ve never had the problem of the part getting chopped off. :thumb: So, there must be some difference even though it could be just the nature of the SMM being more sensitive to the recorded part. I’ve also found that timing my loop so that the part finished before I stop the loop helps. Often, I record the part at double tempo & 1 octave up so that I can then pitch down an octave. For free tempo stuff this works great & of course if the end is say 2 seconds before I stop the loop, it becomes 4 when I pitch the loop down. Still, a big wish is to be able to record across the loop without the part being chopped or glitched. :facepalm:

    I realy like the look of the boss slicer. My drummer has a loop station and he has told me that you dont get a gap at the end of the loop with it so I may just get a dedicated looper and just use the haz for delays.That gap still bugs me though!! why!!! I think ehx should let us know!! apart from that my haz is my best friend!

    Well, I highly recommend the Slicer, it’s without a doubt for me the best Boss pedal I’ve ever used. It also has MIDI SYNC which for me has worked great. I’ve recorded a lot of parts on previous projects & not had a single problem although I do find giving it a few measures to sync up works best. I agree that it world be nice if an EHX Brainiac would address the glitch problem on the SMM. I hope this gives enough of a hint……….

    in reply to: Stereo Memory Man w/ Hazari has gap on loop #102655
    Folkstone57
    Member
    Quote:
    Hi! I found that with mine also. At first I thought it may be a fault as I was used to doing loops on a 202 sampler(with a 202 you edit out the gap) I have found that with practice you can get it so it loops good and if your playing in a band situation it wouldnt be noticed ( as long as you got it in time haha!)

    Hello,
    I would think using it live would present it’s own problems since I’ve only recorded with mine & it usually takes a few tries to get the part I’m recording to not get chopped at the loop. I just bought a BOSS Slicer & although I recorded several loops with it I’ve never had the problem of the part getting chopped off. :thumb: So, there must be some difference even though it could be just the nature of the SMM being more sensitive to the recorded part. I’ve also found that timing my loop so that the part finished before I stop the loop helps. Often, I record the part at double tempo & 1 octave up so that I can then pitch down an octave. For free tempo stuff this works great & of course if the end is say 2 seconds before I stop the loop, it becomes 4 when I pitch the loop down. Still, a big wish is to be able to record across the loop without the part being chopped or glitched. :facepalm:

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 106 total)