Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 25 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: QTRON+ or RIDDLE:QBALLS ? #120282
    FluffChop
    Member

    I think the QTron is analog and sounds very much like a wah pedal. I like my QTron.

    in reply to: 220v 50hz and POG power supply #120281
    FluffChop
    Member

    Hello Mauricio,

    it will be fine with the 50 cycles. In Australia our power is 240Vac 50Hz. I have not owned an original POG, but have owned the Micro POG and POG2 and of course they use the USA adapters and it works fine using a step down transformer. I currently run my Electro-Harmonix QTron on the USA 24Vdc adapter that came with it using a step down transformer. You will be fine doing that.

    in reply to: Adapter for HG+ #120207
    FluffChop
    Member

    Yes generally speaking enough current being supplied is the main issue. If you run a 300mA supply and the pedal needs 200mA it should be fine. The thing to remember is that if it’s a regulated DC power supply you will never have a problem.

    Unrelated but interesting to note is that I had a Seymour Duncan Twin Tube pedal that was needing about 760mA at 12Vac or thereabouts. I used a 12Vac 2amp supply and it made the internal power supply transformer run very hot. This is because the supply was an unregulated AC supply. Sure it would run 12Vac at 2amps, but at only 1/3 the current needed it wasn’t loaded down enough to settle at 12Vac. In short the transformer was seeing higher than 12Vac.

    in reply to: Holy Grail – is it the right one for me? #113490
    FluffChop
    Member

    A delay pedal into the Holy Grail gives those large reverb sounds.

    FluffChop
    Member

    I found the Memory Toy had a loose board inside that made it not work. I had to push the circuit board into the other board. Then the reason I got rid of it was because there was a dramatic volume difference between bypassed and effected signal levels. I didn’t really like the mix control going from full dry to full wet. I use an MXR Carbon Copy which doesn’t have the volume discrepancy. Also with the mix control up full it’s a 50/50 mix. Why that matters is that you have more control over setting it to say only a 20% mix level. The Memory Toy is at 50/50 at half way up. If you never use more than 50/50 which I imagine is 99.99% of the population then you basically have a pedal with half the sensitivity on the mix control.

    in reply to: POG2 – Not Saving Presets #113450
    FluffChop
    Member
    Quote:
    No Pog for me, its the HarmonyMan.

    Last Post for me here in this forum. This particular forum topic “Help/Technical Questions” serves no purpose, they basically rely on volunteer help and offer no over-sight for advice given. Not a good way to run a Company sponsored forum.

    Yeah sure blah blah rant rant….

    I’ve owned the Harmony Man, the Pitch Factor, Boss PS-5, Micro POG, POG2. The Harmony Man is NO POG!!!

    in reply to: How can you not love Flerb? #113418
    FluffChop
    Member

    One amazingly lushious sound is to run the Neo Clone into the Holy Grail on Flerb. It gives a very spacial sounding effect for clean guitar. If you turn either pedal off you lose the effect. The combination of the two is great on the spring setting but flerb takes on a whole other dimension.

    in reply to: Flanger Hoax! OMG! #113216
    FluffChop
    Member

    I have tried my Flanger Hoax on and off the board a few times. The first one was actually faulty so it wasn’t off to a good start. I find it to be too subtle for the most part. I have an MXR Micro Flanger and a Small Stone Phaser. If I want a Flanger I put on the Flanger, and if I want a Phaser I put on the Phaser. The thing about the Flanger Hoax is that it simply cannot do either role with any real authority. It’s always very wishy washy and weak sounding. I think it would be nice to be able to bypass the delay lines so as you could focus in on just the swept phaser and hopefully be able to get a traditional strong phaser effect out of it. It’s just too big, too subtle, too random…how? If you set the swept phaser to give you a “somewhat” strongish phaser sound, ie with feedback up and amount up around 3 o’clock and the blend at 2 or more. Then you can put the delay lines on DC so as to try and keep them out of the way by not having them swept. The positions of the delay lines changes the intensity of the sound so much that a slight movement here or there and the sound is weakened. The short of it is that it is NOT posible to get the sound of a Small Stone from this pedal. If you bypass the phasers and use delay mode 2 or 3 then either the first or second delay line is fixed and the other is swept. You can use this with the blend on full to give you a flanger sound. Don’t expect to be heard when you do this however. If you choose mode 1 or 4 then both delays are swept and you get a sort of flangerish like sound but again it’s still not anything like what an MXR Flanger does. If you put the delay controls at 12 o’clock and everything else off and turn up the rate you can get an interesting ring mod like sound. You can do things to the sound with the delay knobs. Quirky and fun. I don’t find it to be the heinous noise machine people make it out to be. I ran mine into a compressor to even out the volume. People complain about noise but I don’t hear it. It’s not a terrible pedal, it just doesn’t do standard sounds so I don’t find it very useful. Maybe if it was POG2 sized and ran off of 9V and had an output level control, it may win back a few points. The way it is it’s just a little big and non-specific sounding for me.

    in reply to: Graphic Fuzz, should I get one? #113215
    FluffChop
    Member
    Quote:
    I’m glad because my pedalboard is starting to make me look like a hoarder lol

    “Hoarder” that just about brings tears to my eyes. I so know what you mean hahaha.

    in reply to: FLANGER HOAX #112900
    FluffChop
    Member

    My Flanger Hoax made it out of the box again today. I have put it on the pedal board and my MXR Phase 45 has been sold and the MXR Flanger is on eBay. Now to anyone reading this they may think I’m implying that the Flanger Hoax does what those two do. It doesn’t have the directness of sound of either of those two. It’s a gentler softer effect. What I like about it is that it’s not like either of those but like a blend of subtle flanging and phasing.

    in reply to: Are EHX pedals REALLY True bypass? #111394
    FluffChop
    Member
    Quote:
    Quote:
    …but I wouldn’t let that ever put me off buying something I wanted, just because something isn’t TB doesn’t mean it’s got a rubbish bypass.

    I agree, The true bypass on my Big Muff is actually way worse than the buffer on my Tech 21 Boost RVB, so I guess it’s just a case of quality regardless of the idea that only “True” bypass doesn’t colour your tone, as alot of people are led to believe.

    Worse how? That doesn’t make any sense at all. The buffer must be noisier. If you plug the buffered pedal into a high gain device you will hear hiss coming through. I compared an MXR Flanger with a Stereo Chorus. The Flanger has a wire direct from input to output and it’s dead quiet. It’s not true bypass they call that hardwire bypass. The input to the circuit has a high impedance buffer which prevents the circuitry loading down the input and bleeding off top end. The Stereo chorus is a buffered bypass and has no direct wire from input to output. It’s as noisy as all hell put into the same post gain stage. You have to know how to test the effectiveness of the bypass before making random statements. This is how completely incorrect thinking comes out to be used as a fact by someone else. Something isn’t right about what you’re saying. I don’t think your muff is true bypass if it’s worse than a buffered pedal. If it is true bypass you might be talking about the sound when it’s on, which is a totally different story. If it’s on it’s not bypassed so it could be worse and that I could believe. Or you may be talking about the loss of treble due to not having any input buffering between a guitar cable, the pedal, and another guitar cable. In that case the buffer would improve things noticably. However, the actual quality of the bypassed signal isn’t the reason you are noticing an effect.

    In my simplest setup I use a Boss NS-2 and put all the true bypass pedals into it’s send/return loop. Then you have buffering on the cable from the guitar to the pedals input, and then more buffereing from the pedal to drive the cable from the pedal to the amp. That is ALL you need and you will never get any better sound by using any other pedals with buffers over all true bypass pedals. That’s my opinion because that is a fact. It’s not a question of belief it actually is the case. It’s not open to discussion. True bypass doesn’t color your tone, that is not open for debate.

    in reply to: The What Is The Current Draw For That EHX Pedal Thread #111231
    FluffChop
    Member
    Quote:
    Dr. Q (Nano)
    Freeze
    Deluxe Memory Boy
    Microsynth (XO)
    Stereo Memory Man with Hazarai
    Voicebox
    Stereo Clone Theory (XO)

    I haven’t read through all the manuals for these pedals yet.. So if this info is listed there, ignore me so I may find it on my own. Oh, and thank you, EH Man for the Excel Sheet!

    TGM

    Dr. Q (Nano) mine measured is 1.95mA

    in reply to: The What Is The Current Draw For That EHX Pedal Thread #110993
    FluffChop
    Member

    Micro POG 172mA
    Holy Grail (Nano) 101mA
    Dr. Q (Nano) 1.95ma

    FluffChop
    Member

    Thanks :thumb:

    in reply to: Memory Toy vs… #103040
    FluffChop
    Member

    The Memory Toy and Stereo Clone Theory arrived a few days ago. I didn’t like them so I have already sold them on eBay and bought another MXR Carbon Copy and Voodoo Lab Analog Chorus.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 25 total)