Hope this is working by the time I get my Micro POG next week!
It’s too late for the other pedals (I live in Mexico, so postal service was NEVER an option), but I still have some EHX to go

And that right there is the reason why I’m getting one this Christmas

Only drawback from adding a Speaker Sim here would be that it’d lose a part of the market. Bassists and Keyboardists usually go through a D.I. and out to the PA, no EQ but the pure tone of the instrument. Adding a SpkrSim (specially a GUITAR SpkrSim) would ruin the Headphone AMP for them and it’d go to Guitarists only.
EHX recently just found a good market on Bassists or they wouldn’t of released 5~7 pedals finally tailored for bass. I’m just putting out there what I’d of thought of if I were Mike Mathews… which I wish I were

I must say as a proud owner of he Stereo Pulsar that it all depends on what you’re trying to do with the effect. The SP might not have the grit of tubes, but it isn’t sterile or cold at all; it has all the analog sound you’d want.
I think the Stereo Pulsar can get some experimental sounds since it’s maxed on Depth near 1:30 and after that it gives a weird phaser/ring mod kind of sound while the wiggler is more smooth and refinate. Both can pull a really sweet tremolo though, so I’d say you match both with your guitar at the stora and see what you like as of Versatility, Tone and whatever you wanna achieve with the effect.

Quote:

As for the return… I think I’ll keep it.
I played around with the Nano Clone for a while and decided I’m for it. In the future I will pickup the neo clone and small clone and decide which one suits my needs best, I’ll probably sell the others.

thanks for the help!

Definitely! The Nano Clone is the black sheep outta the Clone Family. The Neo clones is really close to the Small Clone and I’d recomend it if you’re not thinking about tweaking the Small Clone (Since it has bigger components you can “customize” it’s sound to your liking). Specially because of the footprint.

Dñ³nde? Cuñ¡l? Cuñ¡nto? WTH?

I just fidddled around like an hour comparing the Octave Multiplexer and a Micro POG on a P-bass (I use a Stingray, but I couldn’t take it to the shop that day). I also threw in the Bass Muff I was buying at that very moment.
The sound of the Multiplexer is YUMMIELICIOUS!! Its analog, dirty, sub-bass octave sound is really great! Both with the Sub Switch on and off it tracks really well and sounds awesome. Only problem I found is that it can’t go below a normal B note. It does well as far as a C, but anything below that it starts glitching and going mad. I’d of bought it had I not have like three dirt boxes to take care of already getting that “dirty sub-bass sound”
The Micro POG, on the other hand, is as clean as a whistle! Tracks on the spot all the way down to a dropped-D tuning (In this case it was the amp that couldn’t handle the note). On all of the YouTube vids I had found the upper octave sounded thin and fake, and it does! However, if you mix just a little bit of it (I never got it past 1 o’clock) you can make sure you’ll NEVER get lost in the mix. The sub-octave doesn’t sound quite like your original tone, but if you keep your dry signal at input level it’s hardly noticeable (And I bet in a band situation nobody will notice it).
Bothsound rather good with the Muff in front of them, but the Multiplexer gets quite muddy (after all, it sounds dirty by itself) whilst the M-POG just fattens up your sound. As I knew on my last post I’ll save up for the Micro POG.

Hope my extensive post helps in any way

PS: Check out my band, I use a lot of EHX effects in our songs (Mostly live, but still )