Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 736 through 750 (of 797 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Cryabetes
    Participant

    freeze is sounding like it’d be instant post-rock, esp if combined with the cathedral.

    in reply to: HOG with a 1 Spot #109437
    Cryabetes
    Participant

    this thread is hilarious for people with a dry sense of humor.

    Cryabetes
    Participant

    The Boss PS-3 is also good for organ sounds (more sigur ros type organ sounds than parliament/funkadelic type organ sounds) and for faux-strings sounds [modes five and seven, respectively]. It’s certainly no HOG or POG but it does its thing and it does it well.

    as far as cello sounds, have you considered using a bow on your guitar? it takes a little bit of practise but is one of the more impressive things to pull out live.

    can’t help you with the woodwinds though.

    in reply to: 2880 sesequent loop WAY too loud #102813
    Cryabetes
    Participant

    really? oscillating feedback on the loops seems like a daft idea. also mine doesn’t have that “feature”- it has attenuating feedbacks and ‘off’ on the sliders, nothing where it would grow unless you continue to overdub the mixdown track (which results in really really harsh digital diode clipping, the likes of which even a fabtone can’t muster)

    in reply to: The EHX wishful thinking thread. #102581
    Cryabetes
    Participant
    Quote:
    Quote:
    Yeah, you have said that before, and I’m curious how it would work. Aren’t cassette tapes designed so the tape is exposed only at one small point? How would the tape delay be able to record and read the signal simultaneously? I guess I see how you could do a short, 1 repeat reverse delay, but beyond that, I don’t see how cassette tapes could be used in a delay framework.

    If you worked it out tho’, I’d def get one, since I have a bunch of old cassettes taking up space.

    Actually, a cassette recorder has 2 heads: the playback and the recording heads. Some high end ones have 3 heads so you can actually hear what you’re recording in real time.

    So I was putzing around with a microcassette recorder at work today (because I want to be Dale Cooper, obviously) and I realised microcassettes have two readable spots on them because the head is offset from the center of tape (ie, they have the backing felt under each roller rather than just in the center).

    Since my company is moving towards digital audio recording solutions, i’m going to have a fair number of players/recorders/decks at my disposal- any DIY guys/forumers want to make one of these into a tape delay with a lovely -70db noise floor? it’s looking like it’ll be easier than a VCR or walkman-based delay.

    in reply to: Ring Thing in the effect-chain? #105479
    Cryabetes
    Participant

    on the left output channel of the 2880, before the tremolo

    #onlypertinenttome

    in reply to: Voice nano Stompboxes #106320
    Cryabetes
    Participant

    just use normal effects and an XLR to 1/4″ TS adapter (or sends and returns on the mixer but that’s a little more challenging in a live setting)

    in reply to: Is the POG2 digital or analog? #106399
    Cryabetes
    Participant
    Quote:
    The only analog polyphonic pitch shift unit was called the ADA Harmony Synthesizer, and it was made for a very short time. Not only was it stupidly expensive, but it sounded awful.

    Danelectro Shift Daddys are designed around the MN3205, I believe…. I mean, they still sound awful.

    in reply to: 2880 sesequent loop WAY too loud #89115
    Cryabetes
    Participant

    does it happen every time you record? on every channel (like, if you were to record an empty loop for track one, then record on track two, is track two too loud)? if you use a fader while it’s in playback mode, is it cutting out sound all the way when the fader is at zero?

    in reply to: Expression Pedal for the Ring Thing #102472
    Cryabetes
    Participant

    would involve unplugging/replugging in things. And quite possibly a few adapters.
    I think the only one I’ve seen that can be used as an Exp treadle (CV out) and volume is the DOD FX17.

    in reply to: Should I use my amp’s effects loop? #102591
    Cryabetes
    Participant
    Quote:
    Quote:
    yeah the only thing I’d look out for is don’t throw the Dtech XBW at the end of the line- the sensitivity control becomes a lot less predictable and there’s kind of a volume cut, especially after an overdrive/fuzz/distortion.
    I only know this because I have the same pedal. use mine on synth though.

    Should I not use it the FX loop then?

    correct.

    in reply to: Should I use my amp’s effects loop? #102646
    Cryabetes
    Participant

    yeah the only thing I’d look out for is don’t throw the Dtech XBW at the end of the line- the sensitivity control becomes a lot less predictable and there’s kind of a volume cut, especially after an overdrive/fuzz/distortion.
    I only know this because I have the same pedal. use mine on synth though.

    Also the FX91- that isn’t a FX91B/C? how’re you liking it?

    Cryabetes
    Participant

    Five Stars:
    2880
    Small Stone (v1) – amazing on guitar and vocals

    Four Stars:
    Big Muff Pi (NYC/Modern)
    Small Clone (Russian)

    Three Stars:
    #1Echo – not really impressed by this. I’m kind of a delay aficionado though so whatever.

    One Star:
    2880 Footswitch. I really don’t bother with this, other than to make the initial loop- everything else I end up reaching down to the actual 2880. I’ve detailed my thoughts on this one in the various 2880 threads :/ At least it can use a standard guitar cable…

    in reply to: Should I use my amp’s effects loop? #102357
    Cryabetes
    Participant

    Also what’s kind of neat about your amp is the ability to completely bypass your EQ section- run a patch from the out of FX loop 1 into the in of FX loop 2.

    in reply to: Should I use my amp’s effects loop? #102507
    Cryabetes
    Participant

    Here’s how I understand effects loops; there are some people who disagree with me on this but in general, this is how they work:

    Your amp has three sections: the Gain/Distortion section, the EQ section, and the Power Amp Section. Imagine it like a string of pedals- Guitar -> (Distortion)-> (EQ) -> (Power Amp) => Speaker Cab

    Effects loops are the input and output of the different sections.
    So for your particular amp it goes like this:

    guitar -> (Distortion) -> [Effects loop 1] -> (EQ) -> [effects loop 2] -> (Power Amp) => Speaker Cab

    And consequently, like most pedal lines, its order should be determined by your mind (no compressor in loop two unless you REALLY feel it’s necessary) and your ears (everything else).

    Also the ‘instrument level’ thing is referring to things like Germanium-transistor pedals- they need the high impedance load of a guitar signal driving them directly from the pickups, the 1K ohm load from the output of another pedal won’t cut it. A preamp (gain stage or eq-based [ie, from either one of the fx loop outs on yr amp]) is going to be the same kind of low impedance that a pedal outputs.

    Hope this helps explain it.

    Sam

Viewing 15 posts - 736 through 750 (of 797 total)