Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
CryabetesParticipantQuote:I’ll try all that later on.
But isn’t it clear when I actually HEAR the DM4 (taking the signal from Channel
through the sound of the OTHER signal (fed from/through Channel A) that you hear them not actually separated?
I mean, it might not be common that you have 2 instrument-inputs on an amp and also both always hot.
But if you switch between 2 signal-paths on a device, they should definitely be completely isolated from each other.I’m also not sure what you mean by if the inputs of the amp are connected.
right, i’m saying that since they’re both ‘on’ all the time, that there might be signal from one going out the other, and the two signals would have to eventually meet at the power amp. It’d work like that since a wire is not a one-way street [yeah transistors are but just bear with me]. are you following my train of thought here?
CryabetesParticipantno offense intended here
but the extent of the circuitry involved in the switchblade consists of a switch.
pretty much anyone can make one. assuming you can wrap wires tightly enough around the little prongs on jacks, you don’t even need solder to make one [although solder certainly would be advisable].so I’m kind of really doubting it’s the switchblade just because there’s really nothing to them.
Can you do me a favor to test if it is the switchblade? plug a tuner in [or something with a ‘signal’ indicator] where your DM4 is in the signal chain, but don’t plug it into the amp
it’ll go
[guitar]->[switchblade]{outputA} -> amp
[switchblade]{outputB} -> tunerwith this setup, when the guitar is going into the amp, the tuner should be picking up just ground noise [you know where it fluctuates between A# and B, like when just a cable is plugged in] or nothing at all.
If it’s not, then yeah, it’s the switchblade.otherwise your amps inputs may be connected. test this by plugging the tuner’s input into the second channel’s input [with the guitar->switchblade out A-> amp thing still going]. If, when playing, the tuner picks up notes, your amps inputs are connected.
I don’t know how handy with a drill and soldering iron you are, but if your amp’s inputs are connected, you can get around this hassle by replacing the switch in the switchblade with a 3PDT and drilling two more spots for jacks in it. Let me know if you’d want more info on this.
edit: actually you’d only need one more jack.
CryabetesParticipantIs the ‘going bonkers’ usable musically at all? I mean, having an effect no one else can duplicate easily is pretty cool
CryabetesParticipantprobably just cheaper to get something like a DOD FX30B to use than to actually mod it.
although you’d lose the true bypass-ness.CryabetesParticipantso…… with that ‘flip between knobsets’ thing…
what’s stopping them from XOing the HOG?CryabetesParticipantwhat’re the LFO/Fuzz/Auxilary controls attached to? is it something new?
CryabetesParticipantoh that kind of just depends on what you’re throwing at it. I’ve never had to turn mine up at all. weak signals you might need a bit but with the aux out of the mixer, you should be fine with them at zero. use your ears and the headphone jack on the 2880 [with the dry signal slider up] and balance it so there isn’t hum.
CryabetesParticipantnope. the sliders work in a reductionist sense only. unity gain is maxed. allows for William Basinski style fadeouts if you’re recording a track [as it will apply resistance to the data in the track and it will get softer and softer each time], but also prevents the tracks from getting louder and louder every repeat [which, I suppose, is rather William Basinski-esque too].
CryabetesParticipanttwo things with that- one is, assuming the send is post-fader, you won’t be able to send to looper only- you’ll need some volume to send TO to the looper, yeah?
the second- the avoiding doubling for inputs- easily avoided with the 2880. just turn the dry slider off/all the way down.
otherwise, i think you’ve got it.CryabetesParticipantyou don’t have to send it back into the mixer [although you can make feedback loops, if you’re into that]. and the 2880 is unbalanced inputs anyways. and the 1202 is unbalanced outs. but yeah. the Aux send method would work. then just turn down the mic channel’s aux send .
do you run stereo-in to PA systems or do you sum to mono? [this is just my idle mind a-questionin’]
CryabetesParticipantnope. what looper are you using, that it takes balanced ins?
CryabetesParticipantservice departments = marketing & sales dept. call them. here’s the number: (718) 937-8300. ask for Chip.
CryabetesParticipantCryabetesParticipantI play originals mostly, or pick my battles with covers. was in a ‘jam-rock’ cover band for a bit, but I think the closest we got to U2 was the Talking Heads [which I was fine with playing]. and I don’t work for EHX, I just hang out at the forum.
and Ron, spot on with the Led Zepplin assessment. Can’t wait until 5-20 years from now when people still won’t shut up about the Red Hot Chili Peppers.
CryabetesParticipantQuote:I’m a big fan of EVENTIDE, for a start!
I think that made some great great pedals in the past (see Gilmour, Edge and zillion others).
If one spends some time reading the web will quickly realise that the early u2 Edge sound is still something hard to cover. There is no such product out there that can do it in an authentic good way.
Yes, rack stuff, but who is keen to drag around heavy and complicated boxes nowadays?
EH could ask Mr. Edge if he would be keen to do a memory man pedal with his name on it which could be the best out there for the job. It has the legacy, who else can do it if not EH? Very likely Mr. Edge wouldn’t use it since he moved on long ago from that sound but, hey! How many cover bands are in the world? Name one, I say 1 cover band on this globe which doesn’t have at least one U2 song in the set list!a lot of cover bands don’t do U2 because Bono is a twat & he burned the Irish flag and Larry Mullen Jr can be replaced by an entry level drum machine. it’s just not fun for them to do compared to something better.
Quote:Plus this myth that the new stuff is crap compared to the stuff made in the old good days is something extremely irritating. Why should be that way? Most of the time the new and improved stuff coming out today really sounds bad compared to the old stuff but … WHY? Are we not able to learn from mistakes? It should be easier to do better than worst!….you’re making two separate arguments here. and also, regarding the second argument, Citation needed.
Quote:Don’t know, not a tech myself, not a marketing person either, but I’m just trying to voice a thought that I believe is common among us guitarists, zillions of them judging from all the forums I read in the last few years…
My congrats to Eventide for the good things it produced and keep producing.It’s very apparent you’re not a tech, because you clearly have no understanding of what all goes into the creation of any of your guitar gizmos. also, it’s very apparent you’re not a marketing person, because they generally have some sense of charisma. and it is apparent you’re a bit of a **** to assume that all of us here are thinking the same thing because we’re all guitarists- if we were all on the same page, we’d all be clamouring for the U2 deluxe memory man sound and there’d be one genre of music – u bloody 2.
Congrats on your eventide purchases. here’s their forum : http://forum.eventide.com/cs/forums/ go bug them. -
AuthorPosts