Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 271 through 285 (of 797 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Gilmour Sounds with Poly Chorus #116236
    Cryabetes
    Participant

    Look, if it were something that had a bajillion submenus or a routing matrix or something actually complicated, then yeah my post would be a jackass move. but asking ‘hey do you have the same positions as these well known artists memorized?’ when the entire point behind an analog pedal is to let you DIAL IN THE SOUND YOU WANT- not jump to a preset – is its own jackass move. It shows you’re willing to throw money and not time into your sound setup.

    You got the answer you deserved hombre.

    in reply to: EH 2880 Troubleshooting #116235
    Cryabetes
    Participant

    ^^ that too, if your computer can handle it.

    in reply to: Gilmour Sounds with Poly Chorus #116232
    Cryabetes
    Participant

    you’ve got ears man, turn knobs and make sounds. if you don’t like those specific sounds, keep turning knobs and making sounds.

    in reply to: EH 2880 Troubleshooting #116101
    Cryabetes
    Participant

    it’s only worded awkwardly because it’s one hell of a run-on sentence.

    The 2880 does indeed receive midi clock data and use it for quantizing (snapping-to-grid) loops.
    As far as timing goes, that’ll be dependent on 1- your computer not to lag/glitch 2- you not using the CC #’s of the EHX’s start/stop commands, which will just in general cause synchronization problems.

    I use mine with hardware grooveboxes and I don’t have a problem with clock drift provided the quantize and ext clock buttons are lit. Both need to be lit to sit flush with the BPM.

    in reply to: Pedal Polarity of Big Muff #116230
    Cryabetes
    Participant

    newer ones are center negative
    older ones are tip positive.
    If yours has a power jack that isn’t headphone jack sized, it’s a newer one.

    in reply to: Metal Muff, how you annoy your customers #116227
    Cryabetes
    Participant

    Maybe next one you get, get rehoused right away by the guys at Koma Elektronik [berlin] or somewhere. It’s unfortunate that it broke.

    Also if the bypass isn’t working, you may just have a busted footswitch, which is less EHX’s fault and more whatever company made the footswitch.

    in reply to: deluxe pulsar #116219
    Cryabetes
    Participant

    I think a CV/tap input is more useful though. Then you can sync it to whatever timecode or just hook up a sustain pedal and tap tap tap away.

    in reply to: Interesting ebay auctions and listings on other sites. #116216
    Cryabetes
    Participant

    I wasn’t going to look at the auctions but they said -=L@@K=-

    in reply to: deluxe pulsar #116202
    Cryabetes
    Participant

    ^^that

    in reply to: Urgent: What’s wrong with my 2880 looper??? #116198
    Cryabetes
    Participant

    three effects sends + one master out. six effects sends if you’re sending/receiving signals in stereo.

    fx send 1 – 2880 in
    fx send 2 – M13 input
    fx send 3 – M13 effects loop return (and probably the fx blender and everything with that between the fx send 3 output and the m13 effects loop return)

    you’ll also need four input channels –

    input 1 – guitar/blues driver in
    input 2 – 2880 output
    input 3 – M13 effects loop send
    input 4 – M13 output

    If you are using everything in mono, you could get by with my personal on-stage mixer of choice, the Behringer 1002B. It’s cheap, light/small, has faders for all the inputs, easy to use and doesn’t have a wallwart power supply. You’d have to use the ‘pan’ knobs and one of the outputs (either left or right) as one of the effects sends though.

    in reply to: Urgent: What’s wrong with my 2880 looper??? #116192
    Cryabetes
    Participant

    yep. you’ll need more sends, but then you can use it for paralell processing if you’d want too. Essentially you break the M13 into M13(pre) and M13(post).
    The M13’s input to FXloop send is (Pre), the input comes from an fx send bus on the mixer, the fxloop send goes to its own channel.
    Then the M13 return goes to an fx send bus on the mixer, and the output goes to its own channel(s) on the mixer (post).

    Now as long as the (pre) mixer channel goes to whatever you want in the effects loop, and the effects loop return goes to the (post) send, it’ll behave rather identically to the typical m13 effects loop.

    Also, like I said before, this opens up the possibility of paralell processing – have the guitar sound send to the (pre) and (post) channels simultaneously and both of those routed out to the amp. which is exciting. to me, anyway.

    in reply to: Urgent: What’s wrong with my 2880 looper??? #116185
    Cryabetes
    Participant

    do you know if you can use the FX blender as an expression pedal with an insert cable? and can you set up the M13 to use an expression pedal to control effects send level?

    in reply to: Urgent: What’s wrong with my 2880 looper??? #116184
    Cryabetes
    Participant

    setup 1:

    telecaster to blues driver

    blues driver to left input of 2880

    left output of 2880 to M13 input

    M13 effects send to FX blender input

    FX blender send to small stone

    small stone to DCF10

    DCF10 to magic stomp

    magic stomp to FX blender return

    FX blender out to M13 effects return

    M13 output to right input of 2880

    right output of 2880 to JC120

    downsides to this: can’t play guitar through JUST the M13 + its effects loop effects, or loop based off that. may have some awful phase cancellation.

    setup 2

    telecaster to bluesdriver

    bluesdriver to channel one of mixer

    FX send one of mixer to M13

    M13 effects send to FX blender

    FX blender effects send to small stone

    small stone to DCF10

    DCF10 to Magicstomp

    Magicstomp to FX blender return

    FX blender out to M13 return

    M13 out to channel two of mixer

    FX send two of mixer to 2880

    2880 to mixer channel three (or three/four if using stereo)

    mixer output to JC120

    This would allow you to route everything pretty much however you want (dry, m13-wet, 2880-wet, m13-and 2880-wet only, etc). You’ll want to leave the dry slider on the 2880 all the way down.

    Downsides: JC120 probably expecting high impedance signal so may result in ‘weak’ sound. Will probably take a bit of playing to get the levels to the mixer right, so they aren’t clipping. Have to buy a mixer.

    in reply to: Urgent: What’s wrong with my 2880 looper??? #116183
    Cryabetes
    Participant

    The first involves using the input/output panning on the 2880 for a second effects send. I’m fairly certain it has significant drawbacks due to not being able to choose the input source (and your non-looping sound ending up being half dry if you want any effects). The second should work quite a bit better but would be prone to feedback loops if you’re careless.

    in reply to: Urgent: What’s wrong with my 2880 looper??? #116182
    Cryabetes
    Participant

    I’m not really sure what the problem is. Do you have a spare mixer you can use? preferably one with two effects sends? I have two ideas you could try but i’m not entirely certain they’d work, and one requires a mixer.

Viewing 15 posts - 271 through 285 (of 797 total)