That’s good to know.

I’m on the fence with this one. It’s a very functional looper and worked perfectly at my last gig.

I’m using my own SD card. This SD card was one I actually used with my old 45000 before I sold it.

I was really disappointed I couldn’t get the 22500 to read and play them. It seems to recognize that there is something in the memory but won’t play anything at all..

I’m considering going back to the 45000, but I really think that you guys should update and upgrade 45000 to incorporate features of the 22500 and keep all the existing ones . . . XLR input, the bpm, serial/parallel, Locked/Freeform, larger tap switch etc, MIDI expansion, etc.

The 45000 is cool as is, but . . . you guys have lots of competition now. The Ditto X4, The Pigtronix Infinity, Boomerangs etc.

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

the new tt1100 has ( MN3008’s

Wait . . . so EHX needs 8 MN3008 chips to get 1100 milliseconds; and yet Moog only needs 6 MN3008s to acheive 1200 ms (Moog 104M SD Super Delay)?

What’s up with that?

On the TGP forum, everyone seems to have the notion that the new EHX delays are using the new MN3005XVIVE. Howard Davis himself says it sounds just as good.

The max delay time IS a function of the capacity of the chips, but it is also a function of the clock speed they are run at and the extent of filtering used. Heck, you can squeeze a full second out of a single MN3005….IF you are willing to live with 1khz bandwidth (or less), and the filtering needed to make the audio output consist of ONLY audio and not clock noise.

So, 1200msec out of the euivalent of three 4096-stage chips? Sure, no problem. It won’t sound expecially bright or crisp, but it also won’t sound like listening to the apartment unit next door through a pillow pressed up against the wall.

I wasn’t proposing that Moog would only use 3 chips, but since the cost on the new chip is relatively low perhaps they could just stuff the pedals full of em.

The reviews of the MN3005XVIVE are starting to come in . . . and they seem to be mixed so far.

Sticking with MN3008s may be the way to go. I would definitely say that tonewise the Moog 104M SD kicks the original DMM1100’s butt.

Quote:

the new tt1100 has ( MN3008’s

Wait . . . so EHX needs 8 MN3008 chips to get 1100 milliseconds; and yet Moog only needs 6 MN3008s to acheive 1200 ms (Moog 104M SD Super Delay)?

What’s up with that?

On the TGP forum, everyone seems to have the notion that the new EHX delays are using the new MN3005XVIVE. Howard Davis himself says it sounds just as good.

SOLD!!!!

Bogner Mephisto Demos:

https://soundcloud.com/thecrimsonmoog/sets/mephisto-demos

I thoroughly go through nearly every tone setting with different guitar tones and playing styles.

You can hear my soundcloud clips using this amp w/ my Moog Guitar and tons of EHX effects here:
https://soundcloud.com/thecrimsonmoog/sets/moogphisto-variations

RJ’s demo for Bogner: