Forum Replies Created

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • BigStone
    Participant
    Quote:
    Have you tried glass cleaner (windex type stuff?)

    No, haven’t tried glass cleaner. I did gently experiment with “Fantastic” and it started taking the red off the face of my red Small Stone. It did not ruin the finish, but my cloth started taking on a very slight red tint so I stopped. I’ve seen used EHX pedals where the paint / ink was noticeably smeared, so… don’t want to take any chances. Mild dish detergent and water seems like a safe bet, but again, the goal is to figure out how to apply a nice “shine”. With some painted or even heavily inked items, you can even take a mild car wax and buff lightly and it’ll achieve a deep shine, it can make a big difference in the appearance. But… pretty much anything other than water is a potential hazard if the existing finish is very “weak”. But hopefully more knowledgeable people will chime in with some ideas. I’m sure there are guys out there that do serious restorations on these things and they must know the tricks. Finally, a beat-up old damaged EHX pedal could maybe be gotten for cheap and then just use it as a guinea pig.

    BigStone
    Participant
    Quote:
    …Try as many reissues as you can and pick the one that sounds best to you… Seriously, I’m a dude that hooks up 8 in a row. All of them will sound close, no 2 completely alike and some will speak to you more then others will.

    I dig it. I agree. I do this as well. :)

    I just remembered… you can still buy a brand new Small Clone re-issue, I see them advertised. Are these still currently in production or am I just seeing old stock being advertised?

    If these ARE still being produced, how might the brand spankin’ new ones differ from ones that are 10 years old… if at all?

    I certainly dig your point about just listening to everything and letting your EARS make the decisions. I’m totally about that. But at the same time it’s interesting to at least have some idea of the history and what’s under the hood of certain period units etc.

    BigStone
    Participant

    I dig it. Makes sense.

    Did any of the Small Clone re-issues ever come with a chip OTHER than the MN3007 or SAD1024? I think I had read somewhere that there was another chip that came along later on that was cheaper and yielded lesser sonic performance (MN3207 I think?).. did any of the Small Clone re-issues use this or any other “lesser” chip?

    Because if all the re-issues have the MN3007 and sound great like the ones I have here, then I suppose it’s safe to say that you can’t go wrong with any re-issue unit.

    Previously when I was scouring Ebay for a good Small Clone, I felt like I was rolling the dice and wasn’t sure what “version” or what chip I’d be getting and if it would sound as good as the one MN3007 Small Clone my buddy had.

    So, in sum, do all the re-issues have the MN3007, or should we be aware that some MAY have a “lesser” chip?

    EH Man, thanks so much for all your help.

    BigStone
    Participant

    Thank you!

    How would you describe the public perception of which chip is “better” or more preferred in the Small Clone specifically? Just curious.

    Again, one thing I feel pretty confident about, the MN3007 Small Clones I have here sound absolutely great. They ARE “re-issue” units since they do have the little square cut out in the circuit board for the switch.

    I’ve played with lots of different choruses over the years and these “re-issue” Small Clones, in my opinion, have no weaknesses whatsoever.

    So of course my curiosity gets the best of me and makes me wonder why guys are asking over twice the price for older “non-re-issue” units. This would tend to suggest that the public perception is that the older ones sound “better”. Or…. is it really JUST Kurt Cobain??? :)

    BigStone
    Participant

    Thanks!!!

    One last question:

    What are the sonic differences between units with the MN3007 and units with the SAD1024, if any?

    Thank you.

    in reply to: Vintage Electric Mistress 18V – power supply info…? #116998
    BigStone
    Participant
    Quote:
    It has a 1/8″ jack on the back for an 18vdc supply. The plug is 1/8″, positive tip.

    Beautiful. I have a power brick with an 18V output and a cord for the brick with 1/8″ jack, positive tip… looks like I’m all set.

    Thanks so much EH Man, you’ve been incredible helpful.

    BigStone
    Participant

    Thanks!!!

    BigStone
    Participant

    Thank you!!!

    Wow, very interesting.

    So this means that the 5 single chip OTA configuration is the true “version 3” configuration… and this is what is used in the later “reissue” units that came with the status lamp on the top, yes?

    Interesting how they did indeed revert back to the version 3 innards for the later “reissue” and sort of “skipped over” the vintage V4 configuration (dual OTAs).

    So you say that EHX will likely start making the “reissue” type Small Stones again soon? That would be sweet!

    Thanks again, I greatly appreciate the help!

    EDIT: is the 5 single chip OTA configuration considered “superior” to the dual OTA set-up… or vise-versa? Just curious as to what the general consensus is on this. I have not studied the sound of them too carefully yet (just an el-quicko low-volume listen through a cheap, crappy amp) but my initial impression is that they both sound good and not TOO different from each other.

    BigStone
    Participant

    Thanks EH Man!

    So then, would you say that my “1980” units (with 5 single chip OTAs) are actually from 1980? And do you think that my “1982” unit with dual-OTAs is actually from 1982? Just curious. Are you saying that ALL of these are vintage V4, or…?

    Thanks!!!!

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)