Home Forums Review Your EHX Gear magnum 44

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 33 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #81090
    televaco
    Member

    i find the magnum 44 to be simply amazing, running through one 12″ sweet tone ! wow ! thanks for a great product

    #113001

    +1 on the amazing 44Magnum. I run it thru 2×12’s. I would buy another of something happened to this one.

    TGM

    #113579
    Black Hermann
    Participant

    In the past I have had great luck using clean sounding small PA heads(like Earthe Mates, Kustoms)and then running them through a 2-12″ with decent speakers. Using EQ and OD pedals, I get a great sound that pulls out the guitar’s qualities. I am thinking of getting the .44 Magnum for the same use in a smaller format.. Youtube can only give you so much..does it stay clean sounding at higher volume?I’m not really concerned if the tone is kind of plain, just a good bit of headroom that lets my telecaster be a tele, and my Les Paul be a Les Paul. This looks promising, thanks!

    #114495
    t.shamone
    Member

    I bought the .44 Mag to be a backup and a super portable setup. I hook an AdrenaLinn and a LPB-2ube into it and it becomes complete. The tube preamp gives it extra touch and warmth and I can get lot’s of sounds out of it. I play at a lot of places that have cabs already, I’m just going to mount this stuff on a pedal board. I also have a Carvin 2 x 12 to plug this into. Very cool. In this pic I’m testing it out through my Boogies speaker.

    [img]http://mysite.verizon.net/vzezbpai/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/Backup.JPG[/img]

    #114505
    fantomenos
    Member

    Great pic! Nice to see the LPB2-ube in action, it’s an under-rated pedal IMO. Way to turn the 44 magnum into a hybrid amp!

    #114541
    dulcetpine
    Member

    I am interested in a setup with either a 22caliber or 44magnum, but it doesn’t seem like any of the EHX preamp pedals (2ube & muffin) have effects loops, but you’d want to have whatever distortion your using pretty much up front of your effects in the chain… could you still make it work?

    22cal — reverb — delay — ring thing — pog2 — distortion/fuzz — preamp — guitar

    #114542
    fantomenos
    Member

    Well, the LPB2ube being stereo means you can gang the channels and put effects in between. I’d put the dist first, like:

    22cal–2ubeChan2–modulation–2ubeChan1–dist–guitar

    This way, you can use the gain from channel 1 to hit your modulation effects, then use channel 2 as a master volume to bring the signal level up to where the power amp wants it.

    #114980
    fmalitz
    Member

    I’m completely baffled. I got my 44 Magnum today. It’s quite dark sounding with a fat, congested lower mid-range. I admit I prefer the Fender mid-scoop sound and this is completely incapable of approaching that type of tone.

    I’s plenty loud but lacks detail and depth. It has no richness. It gets closer with my Xotic RC Booster with the treble boosted all the eway up but it really sounds best with single-coils. My wonderful PAF-equipped vintage Gibsons sound, for the first time ever, like crap.

    I’m an older working pro (and a magazine reviewer and writer with over 30 articles so far), and really love the idea of lightweight stuff to carry to my gigs. The Crate Powerblock, another Class-D amp, sounds fantastic, partially due to the preamp but even with the preamp bypassed, it’s transparent, allowing the real tone of the guitar to come through. My 44 Magnum destroys (humbucker’s) tone.

    It’s not badly distorted and the built-in overdrive sounds a bit better while providing plenty of sustain with my 335-type instruments but it’s just so loud and dull at that point, I cannot use it at any gig unless I’m bringing my Strat and/or my Teles. Is it possible that the positive reviews all involved processing before the Magnum? How do your samples sound alone?

    Finally, I was kind of amused when I saw the picture of a huge pedal board with the little amp on board. What’s the point of a tiny, lightweight amp on a large heavy board? Just having fun, one supposes (or a back-up amp, maybe?)

    Is there an upgrade to bring back the highs and transparency? Any suggestetions out there? Does EH read the forum posts? Shall I write them directly? Seems like a voicing problem–not an issue with class-D architecture.

    Oh, one more thing: You might want to know what I used for speakers. I tried both 4 and 8 ohm combination of cabinets, all home made and used for magazine speaker testing. I tried the Jensen Blackbird, Celestion G12-65 and a Kendrick Brownframe–all good speakers.

    I’m stumped.

    I welcome your thoughts fellow players.

    #114987
    Cryabetes
    Participant

    Ehx really doesn’t read much if any of the forums.
    and the tiny-amplifier-on-giant-board thing could be maybe a personal monitor if the venue just provides a ‘front of house’ monitor setup or they don’t want to have to get an amp and a roadcase just be told to turn their 200 watt Sunn Concertlead down because it’ll just be mic’d anyways.

    Also bear in mind it’s just a power amp. ever plug JUST an electric guitar into a PA? it sounds flat. Amps provide [natural] compression/maximization and overdrive. Try running an amp sim or an enhancer or a sonic maximizer or even a dirt pedal with the tone up and the fuzz/gain low with it and see if you like it better. It’s more of a pick-your-own-preamp type idea. All that ‘real tone of the guitar’ stuff? no that’s the real tone of the amplifier. Sorry. As a synth player, that whole attitude bugs me- yeah, there’s a bit of your tone coming from your guitar, your playing style, but the bulk of it is in your preamp(s).

    and lastly, you aren’t supposed to use it with 4-ohm cabs. just throwing that out there.

    #114988

    +1 Cryabetes. I love my 44Mag. And I’m really happy it doesn’t do that ‘Fender’ thing to my tone. I find it very versatile, with the bright toggle giving a nice added sparkle when needed. I think it even sounds better then my ’59 Musicman 15″. I’m running it into an old Line6 Spider 2 x 12, which I gutted and turned into just a speaker cab.

    TGM

    #114989
    fmalitz
    Member

    Dear Cry,
    Thanks for the reply. You could be right but let’s examine a couple of aspects just for fun. While your assumption about the use as a monitor amp is a great idea, the 44 seems to have no clarity–no high frequency extension, so articulation of vocals is unlikely. I’ll plug in a tube mic preamp and see. Good thought though.

    Look, I want this to sound good. I like EH prodicts and the compnay and it would’ve been a hoot to show up with a pedal board 4 X 4 inches with a little pedal feeding the 44! As I stated, the Xotic RC Booster (or my own custom preamp) helps a lot but it’s still barely suitable for gigging–not in terms of volume–in terms of chime, clarity and overall balance. I HOPE it’s defective. I WANT to keep it. It did get some positive strokes but only on this forum. I still have my hopes up. I’ll call the company. I have contacts there from my writing.

    Now to the overall tone issue. First of all, you are simply incorrect when you say it’s only a power amp. If it had no preamp, you’d get very little sound. Try plugging a guitar into a real true power amp. It cannot work. The signal coming off the pickups is at microphone level–thousands of a volt. A power amp might need 1.5 volts to start cookin’ hard–that could be a thousand times more. It has a preamp; see the bright switch? While the preamp is really as simple as it can possbly be (just a voltage boost and a cheap high boost–or more likely, a high cut if “bright” in actually normal), the overal sound should be far better and it can be. There’s nothing inherent in spectral balance issues with class-D amps, just smoothness sometimes but not a complete lack of character and transparency.

    Finally, I was astounded at your statement about the tone coming from the amp (or preamp). While the amplifier makes a giant difference, you must start with a given. Tell me, Cry, does a Fender guitar sound like a Gretch or a Gibson? How about pedals and amps that completely obscure the original tone? They do exist because they are so colored they can’t get you your sound (if that’s what you prefer). I assure you sir, my 60’s Gibsons sound different from my newer Les Pauls. In fact, every Les Paul, semi-solid Gibson and Epiphone (and D’Angelico) I own sound a little different from each other and all my amps–practice or gigging–show the difference, The 44 cannot. Guitarists use the words “tone woods” because even different woods sound, uh, different. Different pieces of mahogany sound different from each other. A good amp reveals and enhances the difference while adding it’s own color. I love great amps. I detest toneless amps designed from day one as promotional products that appear to be good deals at the guitar megamart.

    I almost forgot: The amp worked slighy better in a 2X12 even though it’s a 4-ohm load–a function of the speaker blending of the two dissimilar drivers. I am always careful with solid state driving low impedances unless they are optimized for that load. I did not play it super loud and shut down quickly as the sound did not improve much anyway

    Once again, thanks for the reply and the insight.

    #114990
    fmalitz
    Member

    Hi Ghost;
    Sorry I like the sound of Fender amplifiers. They have been somewhat successful.

    Let me ask you an important question, can you use the amp without a pedal? Do you notice that it lacks sparkle and chime? Mine does Ghost, even with the bright switch up. Can you play a humbucker through it? I can only get barely adequate tone with single coils.

    One more question: do you hit it with a lot of distortion? I don’t–just a bit of extra drive. I have to pin my treble control on my pedals just to get some chime. I’m not making value judgments on your approach, I’m trying to determine if mine is defective! No one stocks this in all of Chicago. I had to buy mine without hearing it.

    #114991

    Fmalitz;

    No offense taken. I’m impressed with yer writing style, and I’d be interested in ready some of yer articles.

    I use my 44 in a variety of diff settings. Sometimes alone, or with a Catalinebread DLS and a DMB. For my bigger setups, I run my whole pedalboard thru it. And I hit it pretty hard with my v4 Big Muff. I can’t have the bright switch on with the muff tho’. Too much top.

    I’m playing a Godin LGX with stock humbuckers. My main amp is a Mesa Boogie rocket 4 Forty. I use it and the Mag side by side for live looping (verse in one/chorus in the other). The Mag totally stands up to the Mesa in terms of clarity.

    In just about every case the mag is around 9 o’clock fer practice and 10:30 to 11 fer gigs. It starts to break up around noon. From what you have described, the Mag may not be functioning properly. Either that, or my ears are failing me. Sorry to say I’m hopin yer 44 is defective;)

    Bought mine unheard as well. Not a lot of selection in Nova Scotia. Got my at Steves Music when I was in Toronto without my guitar.

    TGM

    #114992
    Cryabetes
    Participant
    Quote:
    Dear Cry,
    Thanks for the reply. You could be right but let’s examine a couple of aspects just for fun. While your assumption about the use as a monitor amp is a great idea, the 44 seems to have no clarity–no high frequency extension, so articulation of vocals is unlikely. I’ll plug in a tube mic preamp and see. Good thought though.

    oh I meant as in ‘monitor of your guitar signal’ so you can hear if your tap tempos are in time or whatever. I suppose it’d work with whatever you throw at it though.

    Quote:
    Now to the overall tone issue. First of all, you are simply incorrect when you say it’s only a power amp. If it had no preamp, you’d get very little sound. Try plugging a guitar into a real true power amp. It cannot work. The signal coming off the pickups is at microphone level–thousands of a volt. A power amp might need 1.5 volts to start cookin’ hard–that could be a thousand times more. It has a preamp; see the bright switch? While the preamp is really as simple as it can possbly be (just a voltage boost and a cheap high boost–or more likely, a high cut if “bright” in actually normal), the overal sound should be far better and it can be. There’s nothing inherent in spectral balance issues with class-D amps, just smoothness sometimes but not a complete lack of character and transparency.

    yeah, an impedance matcher as a preamp, basically. Ever just DI a guitar into a mixer and check the sound with headphones, no eq-ing? It’s going to be the same idea here.

    Quote:
    Finally, I was astounded at your statement about the tone coming from the amp (or preamp). While the amplifier makes a giant difference, you must start with a given. Tell me, Cry, does a Fender guitar sound like a Gretch or a Gibson? How about pedals and amps that completely obscure the original tone? They do exist because they are so colored they can’t get you your sound (if that’s what you prefer). I assure you sir, my 60’s Gibsons sound different from my newer Les Pauls. In fact, every Les Paul, semi-solid Gibson and Epiphone (and D’Angelico) I own sound a little different from each other and all my amps–practice or gigging–show the difference, The 44 cannot. Guitarists use the words “tone woods” because even different woods sound, uh, different. Different pieces of mahogany sound different from each other. A good amp reveals and enhances the difference while adding it’s own color. I love great amps. I detest toneless amps designed from day one as promotional products that appear to be good deals at the guitar megamart.

    On an electric guitar, the aspects that contribute to the initial signal – the strings vibrating from being plucked/strummed/ground into the fretboard/etc are going to be anything the strings make contact with- the fretboard, the neck/body, the saddles/nut/tuners, etc. the pickups are going to apply a sonic signature to that sound and there’ll be massive differences from pickup to pickup, especially among handwounds like your vintage gibsons. It’s a different spec, but it’s an electrical component, like choosing a different capacitor for your fuzz pedal. And a good preamp works well with certain components. The actual amplification piece, the response is going to be best seen when you’re pushing signal hard enough to see the amp’s EQ curve.

    Basically, when you have a guitar into an amplifier setup, you have several parts; Here’s my breakdown of it [and feel free to imagine there being more than I put here for EACH and every solder joint, and effects loop]:
    Guitar strings -> guitar pickups -> on-guitar electronics [vol/tone] -> cable -> Amplifier’s pre-amp section -> amplifier’s power amp section -> speaker -> space between speaker and your ears -> your ears

    Between every part of that, there’s an opportunity for signal loss and EQ-putzing due to differing components. I classify everything between the power-amp section and the on-guitar electronics as a pre-amp. That means pedals, amp’s pre-amp section, everything that basically has a higher than 32ohms input inpedance. Also, while this means it might add something undesirable, it also means you have the opportunity to correct it in the signal path as well. Consider it somewhat akin to the difference between mixing and mastering.

    Quote:
    Once again, thanks for the reply and the insight.

    no problem, thanks for stopping by! Hope you have enough material for your article.

    #114996
    fmalitz
    Member

    Thanks everyone for tolerating my opinoins. If Cry is right, Ghost cannot be and visa versa! Cry says one must expect dull sound from an ordniary preapm section not voiced for guitar (I agree; hi-fi equipemnt won’t work as a guitar amp–sounds lifeless) but Ghost says his sounds pertty good! Hey Cry: Do you actually have a 44 or are you guesstimating?

    I’m gonna call EH and post their response.

    One more thing: this endeavor is not for an article but that’s a great idea. I wanted to gig with it! I’m working on an article right now on the Xotic RC Booster (outstanding product) and their remarkable EP Booster which emulates the old EchoPlex preamp (geddit? Echo Plex) It adds gain but does fatten the tone almost like an overdrive but more subtle–an outstanding produst as well.

    You guys can see one of my articles in the “Archive” section at my site: MagicFrankBluesBand.com
    If you want more, contact me though the site and I’ll send you some–no charge of course. I was with 20th Centry Guitar Magazine as the Gigologist for years and more recently as a contributor for Premier Guitar. Now I only freelance due to the recession.

    I’m the founder of Onkyo USA and I’ve represented Yamaha (still do), Kustom, Sennheiser, Monster Cable, and US Music (Washburn, Randall, etc). I assemble and sell parts guitars. I’m an old guy and play primarily Chicago-style blues–no fuzz tones, no envelope modifiers, etc. Tone is my passion. By the way, if you know Chicago-style Blues tone (early BB King, Otis Rush, even Chris Cain), you understand my inclination for Fender amps. You can’t have the blues in a Toyota and you can’t play Chicago blues though a Marshall stack–British blues for sure, but Chicago-style? Nah…(only kidding!). Tone is in your hands and hearts–not your rig.
    Peace

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 33 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.