Home › Forums › Review Your EHX Gear › Battle of the 3 letter acronym modulation effects

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • May 30, 2011 at 11:23 pm #81652
    cheesedude5050
    Participant

    Hey. I’m debating about a couple of modulation pedals, and really can’t decide. I can’t decide between EHX or MXR. All those “everybody wins” demos online are no good i need an honest word. For a phaser, I’m looking at either a phase 100 or a small stone. For a flanger, deluxe electric mistress of a flanger (most boring name ever). For chorus, neo clone or analog chorus (another boring name.) for trem, stereo pulsar or stereo tremolo (good god, come up with better names!) tell me what you think.

    May 31, 2011 at 12:52 pm #115373
    Cryabetes
    Participant

    Go with EHX. I mean, the Pulsar and Neo Clone are far better than the competition and then the DEM and mxr flanger are pretty close, circuit-wise. The only one that you might have a better chance with MXR on is the phaser – and even then, it’s probably going to be cheaper to go with the offbrand version. I mean, they’re both just four stage phasers but deciding whether you want an ‘intensity’ switch or a ‘feedbacks’ switch is really the difference.

    May 31, 2011 at 10:04 pm #115384
    cheesedude5050
    Participant

    Thanks. I had a feeling EHX would prevail. I think the phase 100 is a ten stage phaser, though.

    June 2, 2011 at 5:23 pm #115416
    fantomenos
    Member

    Unless pedal board space is a factor, I’d get the regular clone theory. You get stereo outs, and vibrato mode. Mine’s been a mainstay on my board for ages, its held up great.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.