- This topic has 10 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 1 month ago by .
Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Home › Forums › Ideas / Suggestions / Feedback › A nano SMALL clone, I mean come on.
I just don’t understand. Ehx makes a nano version of the small stone and then makes a ‘nano clone’.
Why?
Please Ehx make a proper nano SMALL clone with depth switch and everything.
Anyone agree?
i totally agree and i don’t see any reason why they shouldn’t.
LOL
You guys and your nano pedalboards. :thumb:
or they could just ditch the old nano clone and make the new nano clone a straight up rehouse
this makes the most sense because i think most people who’ve tried the nano clone don’t like it.
https://www.ehx.com/forums/viewthread/859/
I don’t understand either.
The Nano Clone almost put me off EH pedals forever. It was the first EH pedal I ever bought, just as I was making those tentative steps from multi-effects to stompboxes. I picked it up to go with a Jeckyll & Hyde (lot cheaper than a H2O!). Horrible. It’s a good job I tried some other EH pedals otherwise I might have been put off for life. Pretty much everything else by EH sounds brilliant. Since then, my board is almost exclusively EH XO and Nano. Might even retire the Jeckyl & Hyde if my wife persuades Santa Claus to get me a Metal Muff.
The Nano Clone is a bad advert for EH and the sooner they retire it or replace it with a proper ‘Small Clone Nano’ the better.
Indeed, I am in full agreement.
So what about making a poll about this issue and trying to seek ehx’s attention in such a way?
I love my nano clone…. there are internal trim pots you can adjust, but I do think a depth switch would be nice. Still sounds great though, and its the only chorus I’ve kept. Simple and easy to use, great for noise solos.
feel free.